Keeping Children Safe From Abductions

Did you know that nearly 7 out of 10 children will get lost for some amount of time at least once in their lives? It is estimated that at least 2,000 kids get lost every day in the United States alone. Though the vast majority are found unharmed very quickly, we've all seen the worst-case scenario in the news. What can you do to prevent this possibility?

Every parent knows the fear of losing their child in a public place, like the mall or a park. In an instant, even well-behaved children have the natural curiosity that causes them to wander off when they see something interesting. In most cases, children don't even realize the effect this has on the parent. Though it is usually innocent distractions that cause a child to be lured away momentarily, if you've seen the news, you know that this is not always the case. A lost child can get scared, hurt, or even abducted, even if you only turn your back for a second to take a phone call, place an order, or speak with a friend passing by.

From a young age, instill in your child the rules for what to do if you are accidentally separated from them. Some strangers can actually be helpful, and the old adage not to talk to strangers may not be the best advice in some situations. For example, teach them how to spot a police officer or a store employee, as both can help reunite the child with you. Even young children can be taught phone numbers and home addresses; this simple step can go a long way. Don't forget to teach them 9-1-1 while you're at it. Never take your child to crowded places without their name and address attached somewhere on them.

There are many devices that can help you protect your children from these situations. For example, one type of alarm will sound when your child has wandered more than a preset distance away from you. Another inexpensive device is a personal alarm. This method is perfect for slightly older children, who can just press the alarm button if they are in need of assistance, and a loud alarm will sound. Too many children try to behave politely even when being abducted, when it is crucial that they yell, scream, and make as much noise as possible. A personal alarm can help them get the attention of nearby adults.

No matter the situation, never assume that your child is safe. The majority of abducted children are taken by family members or those who are familiar to them. Most abductions by strangers take place on quiet roads or sidewalks, though of course the possibility also exists in crowded areas. Children who are walking home alone or playing outside without supervision are particularly at risk. Parents can be lulled into a false sense of security in situation where they believe their children are safe, but the truth is, you must be prepared for all of the possibilities, all of the time. Teach your children that they may not be able to trust a neighbor, bus driver, or anyone else they don't know well, even if they see them on a daily basis.

At Resist Attack we feel that children are our most important treasures why not check out our Child Safety section you'll be glad you did!

Teach your children the value of giving by learning to knit

Harness your children's inbuilt desire to love and do good and their boundless energy, to benefit the abandoned children and Aids orphans of southern Africa. Your children will learn from, and be rewarded by, the privilege of giving.

Check it out!

Education and Talking to Your Children is the Best Way to Avoid Child Abduction

Child abduction is a serious issue in our society today. According to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), a child goes missing every 40 seconds in the U.S.  That's over 2,100 per day and in excess of 800,000 children are reported missing each year.  What's worse is that another estimated 500,000 go missing without ever being reported.

Why so many missing children? 

To understand why there are so many that go missing we need to understand the various forms of child abduction which include parental abductions, runaways, lost or injured children and abduction by strangers.

Parent abduction is the most common kind of abduction and occurs primarily when parents separate or begin divorce proceedings. In a study performed for the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention it is was reported that in 53% percent of parental abduction the child was gone less than one week and 21% were gone one month or more.   An alarming and growing concern is Internet abduction. A recent study showed that 1 in 4 youth received aggressive sexual solicitations that included attempts to contact or meet offline.   Due to these alarming statistics there have been many efforts to help prevent child abduction including the use of;

Child Id Kits
Photo Id card
ID bracelets
ID wristbands
GPS monitors
And even Cell Phones

Additionally, social networks such as MySpace have partnered with Enough is Enough and National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to help keep the Internet a safe place for children and teens.

But is it enough? We need to educate both our youth as well as our parents on how to prevent child abduction.

The best way to accomplish this is through a new DVD called Kids and Strangers: [http://www.KidsNStrangers.org]

This 60 minute DVD is ideal for kids, teens & adults and covers topics from Going to school and playing on the playground to texting and chatting online to parent tips and family talks.

As a society we have taken the rights steps toward helping to eliminate child abduction. We have created Amber Alert, Jessica's Law, Megan's Law & numerous other child laws. But think about it, each of these laws is named after a deceased child and aimed at the 2,000 juveniles, each day, who are victims of child abduction.

Let's stop naming laws after our children and start doing something to prevent these tragedies from happening. Let's start educating our kids and parents...

Child Tracking Device - GPS Tracking For Children

What would you do if you lost your child and couldn't find them anywhere? That's every parent's nightmare and when it happens all the worst possibilities of abduction, child abuse and kidnapping are what you think about.

So what can you do to avoid this horrible situation? There is a solution but keeping your kids with you at all times isn't it. That is clearly impossible.

Thankfully, due to the new GPS technology that is so widely used to help navigation in cars, it is possible to have a child tracking Device to help locate you child in seconds. GPS tracking for children involves a very small device that can be attached to a child's belt, kept in their pocket or hidden away in their backpack.

The vast majority of time parents loose their kids due to innocent reasons. They just wander off in the mall when your attention is at the checkout desk or you are talking on the phone.

The moment you realize they are nowhere to be seen the panic and fear set in. Having a child tracking device in an amazing comfort knowing that, with the push of a few buttons, a detailed map can be sent to your cell phone with the exact position of your child.

Another advantage is that you can signal these devices to start making a loud noise which you will be able to hear and it will guide you to your lost kid. This function is extremely useful when in a crowed place like a mall or at the zoo. It is such a relief to hear the sound indicating your child has just wandered off to have a look at the elephant and is only a few yards away, lost in the crowd.

These sort of tracking devices where first used to locate stolen vehicles but were unsuitable for children because of their size. Now, with modern electronics, the devices are very small and easily carried by a child.

This type of child tracking device is a welcome addition to educating your kid about the dangers in our society and keeping them safe. If the worst case scenario happens and your child is abducted, the first few minutes are vital in locating them easily and getting them where they belong.

Save yourself the anguish and fear of losing your child by purchasing a Child Tracking Device and equip yourself with the tools to locate them quickly. Go now to http://childtrackingdevice.org and learn about the device all parents will want to have.

How to explain divorce to young children

Hot new product - huge potential very little competition. Appeals to all parents with young children.

Check it out!

Treasure hunt party game with pirate theme for children

Established, successful ebook, now open to affiliates. Easy To Organise Party Games For children 5-15 / Church / Celebration Etc. Longtail Keywords, Cross Sell And Upsell. More Info At www.TreasureHuntBook.com/affiliatehelp.htm

Check it out!

Stranger Danger - Teaching Abduction Safety to Children

Stranger Danger is one of the most important lessons for children to learn. We all know the catch phases like "Don't talk to strangers", "Never get into a car with a stranger", and "Don't take candy from a stranger." The phases are simple reminders for kids, but they can make the child insecure and fearful. How can we teach about stranger danger without scaring them or give them nightmares? Here's some quick tips to keeping your child safe.

What is a Stranger?

The first thing to teach children is the difference between a friend and a stranger. Statistics show that casual acquaintances perpetuate most abductions. Children wrongly assume that because the parent says "hi" to the clerk at the grocery store, that they are friends. Quiz your child in the difference between a stranger and a friend. Ask them if... a teacher is a friend or stranger, how about the cashier at Blockbuster, or your neighbor that you have know for 5 years, etc.? This drill is an excellent start.

Saying No to Adults

We teach our children to respect adult and listen to them so most children have difficulty say no to adults. Child Predators exploit this tendency to abduct children by telling them to get into a car with a stern voice. The stern voice makes the child feel they did something wrong and comply with the demands.

Teaching your child, that it is okay to say no to strangers and that they ALWAYS need to ask parent's permission first before meeting stranger's demands. Parents can role-play the parts of the stranger and have child say no.

What's the Secret Password?

In the case of an emergency, create a family password that only you and your child know. A friend may need to pick up your child at school or an activity. How does your child know that you asked them to pick them up and it's not a trick? Yes, you got it, the family password. The child asks the friend for the family password and if they know it, the child knows that you did send them and everything's okay. Don't forget to change the password once it is used.

Important Information your child should know

Teach your child some vital information will assist if they get lost. You should quiz them periodically to ensure they remember it. Give them lots of praise and attention for answering correctly. The vital information for the child to know is your full home address, home phone number, both parent's full names, and cell phone numbers. Many kids are shy around other adults so it's important to build their confidence so they can repeat the information to a police officer or another person trying to help.

Know thy enemy

Awareness is power in abduction safety. Parents should know if any child predators live in their area. Parents can go to http://www.familywatchdog.us to search for child predators with prior conviction in your area.

Tim Rosanelli is a 5th degree Black Belt in Shotokan Karate and owns Maximum Impact Karate located in Dublin, Pennsylvania. For more information about Maximum Impact Karate visit their website at www.maximpactkarate.com

Or...

Read more of Tim Rosanelli's articles at www.timrosanelli.blogspot.com

GPS Tracking for Children - 3 Devices Available to Keep Your Child Safe

GPS tracking for children is becoming more widely available, and there are 3 devices available now that you can choose from to help keep your child safe. It is a terrifying feeling when you can't find your child, and when they are away at school it can be difficult not knowing if they are where they should be. Child abductions are more common than people think and it just takes a second to lose track of a child, but now there is something you can do about it. There are a few other GPS trackers on the market, but the three below are targeted with kids in mind.

1. BrickHouse Child Locator: You may have seen this device on a battery commercial recently; the all too common scene of a mother tending to a younger child only to turn around to find their older child is gone. Panic sets in, but thanks to this device she quickly locates her son and all is well again. Unfortunately, this device doesn't work as well as it shows on that ad and many have found that it is great for finding keys, but not so great for finding kids. So you may want to save your money for one of the other two devices discussed below.

2. SecuraPAL GPS Child Tracking Device: GPS tracking plus an easy to access SOS button, this device gives piece of mind in a handy little piece of technology. One really cool feature is the secura fences that you can place so that you are notified by e-mail if your child leaves any designated spot. You can add as many fences as you like and easily add new ones if new places start to become regularly visited. This device can fit inside a pocket or a backpack and works with both the iPhone and Blackberry.

3. Amber Alert GPS Armor: This is a brand new device that has some very cool features that will work for kids of all ages. You may have seen the previous Amber Alert model before, but this new kid friendly device can be color customized and is about the size of an Oreo. It works with phone apps as well as on computers to use the GPS tracking, which you can watch live and see it move every 60 seconds. The unlimited model comes with an SOS alert, low battery alert, safe zone alerts, a speed alert and more. If you'd like to be able to contact your child you can opt for the 2-way voice which allows you to either call and just listen in, or call your child and be connected with them instantly (it does not ring or vibrate like a cell phone.)

In the article above you learned more about GPS tracking for children and some of the options out there for you to choose from. The Brickhouse child locator may work in some situations, but if you want something a little more reliable, I recommend you take a look at the SecuraPal GPS Child Tracking device as well as the new Amber Alert GPS Armor. You can't do everything to protect your child, but it can give you peace of mind to be able to keep an electronic eye on them. Be alerted if they leave the school yard, keep track of a teenager's speed while they are driving, or just know they have an SOS button within reach if they should need it.

Child GPS tracking is a fairly new option for parents, and it can be a huge relief just knowing they are safe even if you can't be with them.

To learn more about the #1 device on the market visit GPS Tracking for Children

Child ID Cards - Over 2100 Children Go Missing Each Day, A Child ID Card Can Help Find a Lost Child

The U.S. Department of Justice reports:

o 797,500 children (younger than 18) were reported missing in a one-year period of time studied resulting in an average of 2,185 children being reported missing each day.

o 203,900 children were the victims of family abductions.

o 58,200 children were the victims of non-family abductions.

o 115 children were the victims of "stereotypical" kidnapping. (These crimes involve someone the child does not know or someone of slight acquaintance, who holds the child overnight, transports the child 50 miles or more, kills the child, demands ransom, or intends to keep the child permanently.)

While these statistics are startling, the risk of a child missing or being kidnapped, as far as percentages go, is really quite low. They are low, that is, until it becomes your child. Should the situation arise that your child is missing, there are certain pieces of information that you need to have readily at hand to give to emergency authorities. They include:

*A recent photo of the child

*Medical information pertaining to the child

*Any identifying marks

*Physical information such as color of eyes, hair, or do they wear glasses

This information can be kept on a piece of paper at home along with a picture, but what happens if you don't have access to that information? Say you are at the mall when your child disappears, what do you have to help police or security guards?

One answer is that you have a child ID card in your wallet that contains all the pertinent information that authorities need to find your child. The information that provides critical ID information to authorities will go a long way in helping to find your child. It is also recommended that you keep a picture of your child on your cell phone for emailing or download.

It also needs to be noted that approximately 85% of children under the age of 16 carry no form of ID. The risk then arises that if your child is in an accident away from home, say at the skateboard park, and injured or rendered unconscious, they will have no information on their person that First Responders can use in either treating them or in getting in contact with you.

There are countless other examples where the need for your child to carry an ID card will arise. If you are on vacation and in an auto accident and rendered unconscious, will your child have information about them that lists any medication or physical conditions? The times the need for an ID card arises are countless.

It is recommended that your child have an ID card and you have one as well. Additionally, the card should be updated once a year (usually on the child's birthday) or as medical conditions change. Information that should be on the card includes:

*Photo

*Address

*Color of hair and eyes

*Identifying marks

*Contacts with at least two phone number

*Medicines and allergies

*Doctor's name and phone

*Dentist's name and phone

The card should be made of a durable plastic. This way there is little risk of it being ruined when the child is playing or should the card get wet. Another reason for a plastic card is the sense of importance it brings to the child-they'll have a real ID card just like their parents driver's license.

A Child ID Card will prove to be a great tool in the case of an emergency or missing child. We recommend that you give one to your child and keep the other in your wallet. And make sure you keep the card up to date.

In today's society, it is so easy for a child to become lost or missing. Help increase the chances of them being found with the information that will be on your Child ID Card.

To see this and other forms of ID, please visit our web site http://www.familyidkit.com

How Parents and Schools Make Our Children More Vulnerable to Child Predators

There are few things more disturbing than the issue of child sexual abuse. Outside the despicable act itself which physically violates children and defiles their innocence, the crime is one that continues to destroy the victim's life long after the final attack.

Crippled self-esteem and shame result in incalculable losses to our society due to poor school performance and dropouts, the likelihood of alcoholism, drug abuse, and related crime, as well as a tendency toward sexual promiscuity; which can result in prostitution, disease, and unwanted pregnancies. Sexually abused boys are more likely to become predators themselves, as well as having a fourteen times greater risk of committing SUICIDE than boys who were not molested. Victims' lives can spiral downward into welfare dependency, incarceration or utter ruin. It's reasonable to suggest the psychological and long term economic damage definitely outlasts and far outweighs the physical assault. Unfortunately, society as a whole is unknowingly complicit in this widespread tragedy.

Let's focus on two resources that offer the greatest opportunity to protect our children but who bear tremendous responsibility for not providing kids the most effective tool needed to counter sexual abuse. I'm speaking of Schools and Parents-the tool being withheld is namely useful information.

An Ineffective Layer of Protection

If the information provided to our children about Predators was sunscreen it would boast a SPF of around 4. That's enough to make us feel like we've done something, but totally ineffective against preventing them from getting burned. Now in candid defense of parents and teachers, I have yet to see any Predator Protection Program with a level greater than 4. Why not?

I have three assumptions:

1. The inherent sexuality involved makes parents squeamish and is a political nightmare for schools to tackle. The compromised work-around to this "sexual icky-ness" begets watered-down programs like "Good Touch Bad Touch" or abduction-centered education like "Stranger Danger."

2. Parents who are open to sharing greater information with their children are typically unfamiliar with the schemes and methods used by predators and thus have no new information to pass on (or any child-friendly format in which to convey it.)

3. Responsibility is easily shifted. Schools will claim it's the parent's responsibility, parents defer to law enforcement.

In the end our children are left with minimal protection against an adversary who is consistently refining their own battle plan. As we prefer to think about more pleasant topics and rest easy knowing we warned our children never to talk to strangers, predators are networking, gaining insights, sharing legal advice and refining tactics to ultimately destroy our innocent child's life. Predators are getting smarter, better organized, and now (thanks to the internet) they can find moral support in like-minded monsters who reassure them their twisted ways are not abnormal. They're reinforced that it's perfectly normal to want to abuse children; they shouldn't be ashamed of these natural feelings.

What MUST happen to defeat these monsters:

* Children rely on adults to protect them and if we are truly serious about servicing our responsibility, we must show continual vigilance against a despicable, stealthy enemy.

* We must realize the shortcomings of what we're currently providing and work to patch the tremendous gaps these Predators waltz through.

* We must acknowledge that our children are the front-line of defense and that they should be armed with as much information as is necessary to defend themselves.

* We must get over the sexual icky-ness and drag this issue out of the closet like was done with date rape and anorexia.

* We must realize that statistically our child will not tell us of an attack and thus we must use every psychological tool possible to facilitate their reporting.

* And finally we need to arm ourselves with as much information as is available so we might recognize the subtle signs of abuse that emanate from our child's demeanor, as well as the clues a predator drops right beneath our noses.

The First 3 Steps To Increasing Your Child's Predator Prevention Factor

The goal is to assist you in applying a level 60 PPF (Predator Prevention Factor) on your child... one that won't wash off but will continually empower them against getting burned. Although these steps are by no means a complete program, they are the initial absolutes needed to be covered, and require little time, money, and study.

1. GET OVER THE ICKY-NESS

Most parents are uncomfortable discussing The Birds and The Bees with their child let alone molestation and rape! As a parent, I understand this. However, you child's entire life could be ruined because of a discussion you'd rather avoid. I remember being taught in an Abnormal Psychology course the importance of teaching children the proper medical terms for their genitals. Should they ever be called to testify in court, it is nearly impossible for a defense attorney to distort the meaning of the terms Penis, Vagina, and Anus - versus Wee-wee, Cha-Cha and Booty. As adults we need to get over the fact certain anatomical parts are SEX organs. Even Oprah Winfrey cannot bring herself to say vagina. She unfortunately influences her fans and guests to refer to it as "Va-jay-jay." As parents and ADULTS, please call genitalia by its proper name and remove the associated caddy-ness when speaking of it. If you're too embarrassed to talk about it, how will your child ever find the comfort to report someone abusing those areas?

2. REPLACE FEAR WITH EMPOWERMENT

There are certain tactics a Predator uses to silence children that can be extremely upsetting for a child to hear. But unless they hear them they'll never know it's a trick, and consider how much more upsetting it will be if they first hear them from a violent, threatening abuser. You should always filter what your child is exposed to, but understand that, like a vaccine, sometimes exposing them to a tiny amount of the sickness may save them from contracting the full blown disease. Would you really consider it "too much information for a child that age" if that very information could help save their life? The prime ages for molestation are 6-12 years old. Predators are banking on the fact you think your child is too young to hear about their tricks. Danger is only scary if there's nothing you can do to prevent it. Over-censoring may seem like you're being a good parent and protecting their innocence. Truth is, you may be putting them at greater risk.

3. MAKE IT CHILD FRIENDLY

Advertising employs a variable called "frequency" to ensure a message is properly absorbed into the audience's sub/conscious. The strategy is quite literally "frequent exposure to the message." Repetition begets familiarity. A one time discussion does little to provide long-term protection for your child. Like first aid skills, the information needs to be periodically refreshed in their minds. The problem is nobody-not you, not your kids-wants to discuss and revisit abuse.

"Good teaching is one-fourth preparation and three-fourths pure theater." ~Gail Godwin

The key to imparting this information to your child while also side-stepping the sexual icky-ness is to do so with child-friendly stories that engage their fascination. Like ghost stories that arouse their full attention, we offer children books that discuss Predators in the same thrilling format. These books simultaneously entertain, educate, and empower your child and were written specifically to arm them against becoming victims. They focus on identifying, thwarting, and reporting child predators and facilitate an empowering paradigm shift from potential victim to potential hero.

The DANGER in keeping the Status Quo

* 1 in 4 girls is sexually abused before the age of 14. 1

* 1 in 6 boys is sexually abused before the age of 16. 1

* Child molestation is one of the most underreported crimes: only 1-10% are ever disclosed. 2

* An average serial child molester has between 360-380 victims in his lifetime. 3

* The most common ages of children when sexual abuse occurs are between the ages of 8 and 12. 4

The definition of insanity is often quoted as "doing the same thing and expecting different results." Until schools and parents understand the current programs aren't protecting our children, the above statistics have no reason to diminish. As loving parents and reasonable adults, we must all make ourselves part of the solution and not the problem. As political philosopher Edmund Burke forewarned over 200 years ago, "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

1 Source: Hopper, J. (1998). Child Sexual Abuse: Statistics, Research, Resources. Boston, MA Boston University School of Medicine.

2 Source: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin

3 Source: South Carolina Forcible Sex Crimes (1999). Summary, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Columbia, SC.

4 Source: David Finkelhor et al, A Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1986

Steven Carr is a writer and entrepreneur who has utilized his communications & psychology degree in the fields of sales, marketing, advertising, and now child welfare. His goal is to be a force in teaching parents and children how to stop child molestation by providing effective information to identify, thwart, and report child predators.

Charlie Sheen on the battle for custody of the children: "cooler heads will prevail".

Riccardo s. Savi/Getty Images. Susan Etter/INFphoto.com

Is there a relaxation between Mr. Adonis and his ex?

A day after Charlie sheen celebrated shot of two and a half men, stirring a machete on a rooftop in downtown L.A., a hearing in his custody of the spat with Brooke mueller has postponed, according to counsel for the old player in 45 years of indefinteily.

"Any court" today, the Sheen Mark Gross legal eagle tells E! News.

What fate magic warlock was at work? Here's what Sheen has to say.

MORE: Charlie Sheen machete explained!

Home preparation for his latest online fileront tonight - in which he plans to deliver his "Manifesto" - Sheen exclusively tells E! News that "cooler heads have prevailed" in its tug-of-war tyke with Mueller and that the duo seems to have sorted out their problems for the moment.

Is the same for its two daughthers with Denise Richards-Sam, turning 7 tomorrow and Lola, 5.

"Denise is nice," he told us.

Gross refused to elaborate on any sort of deal Sheen and Mueller can be hammered ("I hope that I will have more to say later," it says), but one of the points of friction was insistence of Brooke that a third party monitor keep an eye on the children while they are with Charlie.

Last week, Mueller received an order of prohibition against him and got a judge to order wire of 2 years of the couple, Bob and Max, handed over to the custody of his mother, moira fiore.

The twins had lived with Sheen to his "Goddess" - infested Mulholland estate, aka sobre Valley Lodge.

In this case, a hearing is scheduled for March 22 - as many trolls do not intervene.

Video: Charlie celebrates his Pirate Style of "victory".

View the original article here

Controversy over the custody of the children

A draft Act of the legislature of the State of South Dakota is stirring debate well.

House Bill 1255 would provide for the award of joint physical custody of children in certain circumstances.

The Bill suggests that what is most important in the decisions of the guard is the interest of the parents.

South Dakota has already operated under the standard that custody decisions must take into consideration what is most important for the child.

Opinions in the House and the Senate are divided, but some manufacturers of said law that they do not think that the Bill takes everything into account.

Representative David Lust said: "I think that the concept of joint parenting is something which will be supported by all." The best unit is parental units, mother and father together. What I accept now is to interest before parents of the child. ?

The fate of this Bill will be decided in the Senate this week.

If it passes, parents must partager physical custody of the child.

Some lawyers say that the Bill will create an unnecessary amount of instability in the life of the child.

Family law lawyer Debra Watson said, "the concept looks good in a perfect world, but in reality it does not work." In most cases, a parent or another is mainly responsible for children. Sometimes we see parental shared. And where it is already occurring, it will continue. "But if it does not occur, it is not good to make the change when the child is already going through stress and trauma of their parents separating".

Prosecutor Glen Brenner State of County of Pennington said: "we see lots of domestic violence in our Office that comes in." Often the conflicts we see are divorced parents. The shame of those is the impact it has on children. We are a State generally made in the best interests of children, and I think it is.

Watson, says in this age, about 40% of all the birth of the child, which is marriage. This adds another level of complication in determining custody issues.

View the original article here

Solving the problem of abduction of children is not a piece of cake

The Way of Cake is mysterious and paradoxical. A master of the Way can make his neighbors feel they have filled themselves with tasty cake without ever cutting off a piece. The Way allows its disciple to step outside the boundaries of rational thought by partaking of cake while continuing to possess cake.

The Zen of having your cake and eating it too can sometimes seem to be a feature of the Japanese legal system. The rule of law applies, though it is sometimes hard to know what the law actually is. There is a Constitution that protects people from the government — except when the government finds this inconvenient — as well as a criminal justice system founded on the presumption of innocence, but which manages to find pretty much everyone guilty anyways (because prosecutors only ever prosecute people who are actually guilty, you see).

Yet it is in Japan's most recent responses to growing pressure to join the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction that the Way of Cake may be demonstrated in its purest form.

It has always seemed highly likely (to me, at least) that Japan will eventually submit to foreign pressure and join a treaty regime that effectively represents the international community's consensus on how cross-border child custody disputes should be decided: in the child's country of habitual residence. At the same time, it has also always seemed unlikely that signing the treaty will result in children who have been abducted to Japan by Japanese parents actually being returned to their foreign homes. The Japanese civil justice system lacks the tools to enforce a return and, probably more to the point, it is unlikely to ever be in the interests of any Japanese judge, cop or other bureaucrat to be responsible for a crying child being taken away from a weeping Japanese mother in any particular case. The rule of law is one thing, but Japanese officialdom is not short on cake aficionados.

So it has not been too surprising to read recent news reports that the government is considering signing the convention while at the same time amending its domestic laws to ensure that children are not returned if there are concerns about domestic violence. The Japan Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA) also recently issued a formal opinion that included similar recommendations, as well as suggesting that children should not be returned if it would result in the abducting parent being subject to prosecution in their home country (the U.S., Canada and other countries have criminal penalties for parental child abduction). This would mean that in addition to the civil trial procedures (which should include appeals, according to the JFBA) used to return children in Hague Convention cases, it might be necessary to negotiate nonprosecution agreements with home country authorities in some instances.

Whatever legislation is used to implement the Hague Convention, it is hard to imagine that it will not also include a catch-all "other" caveat that will provide additional excuses for nonreturn in just about any situation. Even without the provision, the domestic violence exception alone will probably be enough to ensure that Japan fulfills its duties under the convention in terms of appearances and process, without actually accomplishing any of the goals the treaty is supposed to achieve in terms of substance.

To be fair, domestic violence is an issue that some commentators assert is not dealt with adequately under the Hague Convention in its current form, and I am certainly not suggesting that it is not a problem in cross-border — or any — marriages. Yet as a matter of law and judicial process, exceptions drafted around claims of domestic violence are likely to suffer from the same evidentiary and other practical constraints the convention is intended to address in the case of child custody decisions. In both situations, factual determinations are usually best made by courts in places where school officials, social workers and other potential witnesses are likely to reside, and where other relevant evidence is likely to be located. This is the child's country of habitual residence under the Hague Convention, and logic suggests that claims of domestic violence or child abuse should also be adjudicated by courts where the conduct allegedly took place. This logic is even more compelling if the claims of violence are linked to a child custody dispute, and if the conduct in question also constitutes a criminal offense, as is often the case in many countries.

Whatever exceptions are provided for in Japanese law, as an evidentiary matter it is difficult to see how Japanese courts would decide whether to apply them except based on allegations by the Japanese victims, with the foreign "aggressor" being put in the position of having to prove a negative, over linguistic and geographical barriers. Unless Japanese courts are willing to start with a presumption that parents claiming abuse are lying (a cruel result for those actually fearing for their lives or those of their children), the safest thing for judges to do in any particular case will be to simply accept the claims at face value and grant the exception.

Japanese judges will be aided in this task by Japanese law, which defines spousal violence as including not just "bodily harm" but "words and deeds of one spouse that cause equivalent psychological or physical harm to the other" (this is from the Japanese government's translation of Article 1 of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims). This already broad definition is further expanded by government publications that go so far as to include "yelling" and "ignoring" as types of domestic violence. Child abuse also is defined as including "words or conduct which cause a child significant psychological harm" (my translation of the relevant portion of Article 2 of the Child Abuse Prevention Act, for which a government translation is not yet available), though even this expansive definition is apparently not broad enough to cover abduction from abroad or the parental alienation that often follows.

To the extent that marital breakup is pretty much always emotionally traumatic for everyone directly involved, the unsubstantiated Japanese media trope about all cases of child abduction to Japan involving Japanese women fleeing from violence or abuse abroad can be said to be true: It will always be possible to find some sort of "psychological harm" that can be attributed to broadly defined violence or abuse if necessary.

However the law is written, it will likely serve as a message to Japanese living abroad that so long as they have the right story when they get off the plane with the children, they do not have to worry about a Hague Convention return order. Whether their story is legitimate or not (and I am certainly not suggesting that all claims of violence are or will be fabricated) will be beside the point — lawyers and well-intentioned bureaucrats will provide advice as to how stories should be scripted to ensure that an exception applies.

What will be interesting to see is how the law and Japanese judges deal with the situation where child custody issues and allegations of domestic violence have already been dealt with in a foreign court. If the law includes provisions calling on Japanese courts to give weight to foreign proceedings (as one hopes it would), it could have the effect of actually encouraging abduction before a foreign court has a chance to deal with any of the issues. Forum-shopping (trying to have your case resolved in the most advantageous court possible) through pre-emptive abductions is of course already a common problem in international abductions, but it is one of the things that joining the Hague Convention is supposed to discourage and remedy rather than induce.

Putting all this aside, an obvious response to concerns over domestic violence and the Hague Convention is that the treaty has been around for three decades and has been signed by dozens of countries despite domestic violence being a universal problem. There is, simply put, no "uniquely Japanese" set of issues here that involves prolonged navel-gazing over issues that are incomprehensible to foreigners.

Yet another point of rebuttal is this: If fleeing to Japan is going to be allowed if it is to escape domestic violence, then it should be OK to escape from Japan with your children for the same reason. But this type of mundane logical consistency is probably incompatible with the subtle rhetorical aesthetics of the Way of Cake.

While the Hague Convention garners most of the attention in the foreign press, there are signs that Japan could be taking steps to amend its creaky family laws to provide for joint custody and postseparation parent-child contact, neither of which are provided for under current law (preservation of access rights across borders is another goal of the Hague Convention, though the same is true of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which Japan has signed but essentially ignores in this respect). The last draft of one version of proposed legislation I have seen includes a prohibition on the unilateral removal of a child from their home; if this provision survives the legislative process, it might be hard to square with a law that could offer a blanket invitation to Japanese mothers to bring their children home from abroad.

Yet how domestic law change fits with the Hague Convention may not be a problem, since nothing may actually happen in the case of the former. In a recent interview (Japan Times, Feb. 3), Justice Minister Satsuki Eda questioned the need to package the adoption of a joint custody regime with signing the Hague Convention, though in the same article it was also reported that "he thinks married couples should be allowed to have separate surnames, but changing the law now would be difficult." That certain sectors of the Japanese polity are still grappling with the staggering complexities of women keeping their maiden names after marriage (and not even touching the seemingly unconstitutional prohibition on remarriage within six months of divorce that only applies to women) might be a good benchmark for how low expectations should be set regarding changes in domestic family law.

Then again, what a particular minister of justice says about anything may not be an indicator of very much in the first place. Since January 2001, 13 different people have filled the position, a one-year term ending in August or September being the most common pattern of tenure. Past ministers — past prime ministers, even — have voiced views on the Hague Convention and other aspects of family law, yet nothing much seems to happen. In 2010, then Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama expressed a willingness to sign the Hague Convention early in 2010, and during her term at the top of the Justice Ministry pyramid, Keiko Chiba's accomplishment was supposedly to have been resolving the marital name issue, yet the status quo continues on both fronts.

Democracy is a slow business, full of messy compromise, of course, yet when it comes to issues that matter to families and children, one is often left wondering who — if anyone — is actually in charge. Cake, anyone?

View the original article here

Charlie and Brooke conclude an agreement on custody of children

Charlie sheen and Brooke mueller finally reached an agreement on the custody of their twins... and, therefore, will be in Court tomorrow morning ... TMZ has learned.

Their lawyers tell TMZ, "Brooke and Charlie have an agreement to resolve their differences." For the benefit of children, their agreement will not be disclosed. They ask the public for the protection of personal information on this issue. ?

As TMZ first, Charlie and Brooke also struck an agreement a week ago ... but it supported when Charlie tweeted words of the agreement.

Since then they have been heated negotiations... and a confrontation was scheduled for court Friday morning - but we are going to said which is now cancelled.

History of development...

Tags: Charlie Sheen, Brooke Mueller, Celebrity Justice

View the original article here

In the best interests of children is often lost in custody disputes

Children need stability; we all do. When there is an ongoing fight over child access or child custody and visitation as it is more commonly known, it is important to realize that the term "stability", in the context of fighting over the division of parental time, is an oxymoron. Particularly, if there is no agreed upon visitation schedule. For example, in some cases one parent may disingenuously stress that access to the other parent must be limited for the sake of the stability of the children. However, when there is an ongoing power struggle to maximize or minimize one parent's time over the other, the lives of the children are anything but "stable".

Children adapt. The world is busy. Life is hectic. The theories or justifications of years past, the "traditional visitation schedule" if you will, that subscribed to the notion that children need to only regard one parent's house as "home" and that they must sleep in the same bed every night, is far less important than often proclaimed. These days, many experts suggest that a rigid "every other weekend and one or two nights a week for dinner" visitation schedule is the minimum recommended arrangement. For many separated or divorced parents, this arrangement may simply not be optimal.

Having parented on a court-ordered, equal-time-sharing schedule, for over a decade, I can attest to the fact that a 50-50 parent split schedule, is far more workable than one might imagine. While it is not presumed that a 50-50 parent split schedule is best for all children in all situations, it seems like a fair place to start. Furthermore, I have found that if parents truly strive to act in accordance with their children's best interest, and if each parent operates from this position of theoretical and practical equality, it is far more likely that one parent will voluntarily, if, when, and as needed, willingly make the sacrifice of diminished time if it is truly beneficial to their children.

If Dad, for example, has been treated as an equal parenting partner, and not as a weekend visitor, there is a greater likelihood that he will go along with future modifications to a schedule if the children's needs or routines suggest a change is appropriate. Once the power struggle for control and the claim for the overwhelming majority of time are abandoned, a set visitation schedule simply will not be as important when compared to what may genuinely be in the children's best interests.

If the division of time is not mutually satisfactory, or if it is not otherwise possible to arrange a basic schedule, a court ordered schedule will ultimately be forced upon already hostile parents. In such situations, any written document or court order must leave nothing open to interpretation. Your life must then be rearranged to fit into the court-mandated child visitation schedule. However, this is far easier and far less damaging to the children than the constant tug of war that often will occur in parental skirmishes. Simply left to the interpretation of loosely worded court orders, some parents will often actively fail to rearrange or modify scheduled activities and time frames leaving the other parent with less time than mandated thereby continuing the struggle for the children's time and loyalties.

When it comes to where children of separated and divorced parents live, how much time they should spend with each parent, and all the related things that come with parenting, what is really in the children's best interests? How should these important issues be decided? Is it ever in the children's best interest to have a stranger in a black robe sitting behind the desk in the courtroom decide such important matters? Shouldn't these issues be decided by the parents who want to put their children first?

When it comes to deciding cases involving children, acting in the best interest of each child is the guiding principle. It has been said that the "best interest standard" really comes down to a judge's "best guess" as to what is optimal for children in a particular case. Who is the judge and why he or she is the best person to make this decision for you and your children is another story for another day.

Parents in conflict will quickly learn the court lingo when it comes to child custody disputes. Everything that either party does is somehow, someway, supposedly linked to, and directly in pursuit of, what are the "best interests" of the children. The "end justifying the means" often becomes the rationale for parents in moderate- to high-conflict cases. High-conflict custody cases often generate a myriad of false allegations and accusations. If the overall goal is to "win" custody, then does it matter if Dad, for example, is falsely accused of inappropriate conduct with his child?

If Mom is recklessly exaggerating or outright fabricating statements, as long as they are only in an effort to make Dad "look bad" so that he will not get custody, is there any real harm done if that accomplishes what Mom knows is really in her children's best interest? Probably not - well at least not in the eyes of a selfishly blinded parent caught in a war of emotion. The sad reality is that in the majority of cases such as these, each parent tries to look his or her best by making the other parent look incompetent or unstable.

The run of the mill "we produced a child and now we hate each other" type of case is a mud-slinging contest with the echoing of the words, "it's in the best interest of the children." In the classic script of course, the man is always abusive, threatening, and intimidating and should only have only supervised visitation to protect the safety of the children. The mother is often referred to as promiscuous and is accused of being inattentive to the physical or emotional needs of the children while also allegedly engaging in a scheme to alienate the children from the father and his family.

The "best interest of the child standard" is not supposed to be a test on good parent vs. bad parent decision-making. However, although some state courts may characterize the criteria and terminology differently, the gist of the court's reasoning in deciding who gets the "prize" of residential custody is to evaluate certain factors. The court examines these factors and weighs the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative environments in deciding who the children get to live with. The criteria for judicial determination include:

Fitness of the parents  Character and reputation of the parties  Desire of the natural parents and agreements between the parties  Potentiality of maintaining natural family relations  Preference of the children  Material opportunities affecting the future of the children  Age, health, and sex of the children  Residences of parents and opportunity for visitation  Length of separation from the natural parents  Prior voluntary abandonment or surrender of the child or children

At the conclusion of all the trial testimony, a judge, a complete stranger to you and your children, will say that he or she has examined the totality of the situation in light of these factors. He or she will say that the court has considered all the factors and that the decision was reached without specifically focusing on any one factor in and of itself. As far as all the possible lies that the court will have heard as testimony, expect that from the bench you will hear something like, "I have had an opportunity to observe the witnesses and assess their credibility and demeanor throughout these proceedings. While I do have some credibility concerns, I believe that it is in little Johnny's best interest to remain in the care and custody of his mother/father (pick one)." Often, when the "best interest" jargon is broken down, there are far more questions than answers.

For example: In child custody litigation, the court, in applying these factors, is called upon to consider the desire of the natural parents and agreements between the parties. Well, let's see. They are both fighting for custody of their children. They are willing to spend the equivalent of their children's college education on attorney's fees and litigation expenses. They are willing to air out all their "dirty laundry" in public. Does the one who will stop at nothing to win have the most desire? Does he/she really want the children to live with him/her, or is he/she just trying to punish the other for ending the relationship? Is it a little of both? Does it really matter what the motive is as long as the "best interests of the children" are served?

Hopefully, the judge will award primary custody to the parent who will allow the children to grow up with a mother and a father both actively involved in their children's lives. Often, that does not happen and the children pay the price. If you do not settle your child access issues following a separation or divorce, you will ultimately turn your children's fate over to a virtual stranger - a judge, at a later date.

When it comes to following the law, judges perhaps have the most discretion in the area of child custody disputes. In practice, they apply facts - or at least "facts" as they appear to them. They decide what the facts are and they decide how to best remedy whatever facts they deem in need of judicial intervention. The rules of law give them great latitude when it comes to determining what they believe to be in the children's best interests. Ultimately, they make the major decisions pertaining to each family law case. They, not you, get to decide how things will be. Such discretion may or may not be a good thing, depending on who is doing the judging and why. In short, you, both as parents, need to grow up and work out an equitable custody agreement, your children will thank you one day.

Mike Mastracci is a nationally recognized family law attorney and mediator with over 20 years of professional experience. He is the author of the newly released and highly praised book, Stop Fighting Over the Kids: Resolving Day-to-Day Custody Conflict in Divorce Situations. In addition to his legal, collaborative and mediation skills, Mastracci brings much more to the table: with an insightful, kind and helpful approach, he shares his personal child custody issues and challenges to better serve you in solving your legal, practical, parental and situational problems. To learn more about his unique style of persuasion, go to http://www.StopFightingOverTheKids.com

The UN children

A report by the UN Committee on the rights of the child has visited the British Government for the international standards batipol of children. A number of critical areas-from the children of the rights of children, from young applicants of the right of children to privacy-Government failed to meet its obligations under international law.

In the evening ?????? Bomford has a report in one area can be selected for a particular concern is the numbers of young offenders reported. More than five times more than 10-14 years are imprisoned now than Milner before twelve years and England and Wales now has the worst record in Europe. But bucking the trend is one area that went from Sunderland of the highest percentages of custody to between low-mainly through a series of innovative schemes for young offenders. In these two young criminals are to be controlled on a drawing, designing the plan which they refurbish the abandoned house, now used by a community drug families.

We can't show you the faces, but you can hear opinions from other young criminals in the PM in the evening.

View the original article here

Husband wife Allegedly Knocks out before Exchange of children, especially.

Husband and wife has 2 children.

Near of the husband and wife of the share of children.

And couples make folders… allegedly and knocks her out.

The police arrived and Taser husband

Who resists arrest

Her husband is holding on the charge of domestic violence and criminal threats.

Read more in the this article San Jose Mercury News: woman punched unconscious during the dispute..

View the original article here

Helping Children Cope with Divorce, Revised and Updated Edition

Named One of the 10 Best Parenting Books of the Year by Child Magazine, this revised edition teaches you to minimize stress during initial breakups and ultimate separation, explain divorce so children don't blame themselves, protect children from parental hostilities, and navigate conflicts of loyalty and alliance.

Price: $17.95

Click here to buy from Amazon

19. Children suffer

Family Court judge Malaysia to resolve intractable custody dispute turned General interview. You can, however, is not much family law experts of this judge child psychology experts and children to harmful when counseling is incredible.

She him her and her mother happy will be assured interview at one time in his room after custody of A child to the mother should be given family court judge ruled.

In case of another child B defendants and, he was sent to live with her mother and shouted to stay with her father, she goes. Had been convinced that her case the Chief Justice did not believe her testimony, and she had been brainwashed to her father and his relatives.

Family Court judge Malaysia to resolve intractable custody dispute turned General interview.

You can, however, is not much family law experts of this judge child psychology experts and children to harmful when counseling is incredible.

One strong opponent Bar Council ?'s House is the family law Committee Chairs Lalitha Menon.

, ? don t see Mummy. When divorced parents children are often caught in the middle.

Not trained in the ? Most family judge applies the principles of what you may need to look at what they have, what kind of many child psychology of family issues. What can you child needs only in their interviews with him or her based on determining how? ?

Menon child interview the highlight to be easy. Is not a simple case of child ? It simple questions like: ? Who are more like?? ? or better ? Who ? of parent?

You must learn to read between the lines to understand judges to get the truth and supervised kids ? Judges are, or have questions different architectures have custody, parents are trained. That more training... ? is required.

Menon has been pushing for training bar ?'s family law Committee, the judge can be useful, says.

You must learn how to recognize and ? They understand nuances and deeper issues.

? Even family lawyers may like this, enough training unhandled what many more judges to. Tough time for many, she is notes ?.

Family law practitioners honey Tan country ?'s family law and law (marriage and divorce) obviously agree that there are some familiar in the 1976.

? A lot of time, and training; To get the judges hear families with problems they come off the bench criminal bench of civil and industrial. Training is in the hands of dissociated their personal experience from the Lord what a judge sent to handle can objectively see family matters important ? Tan says.

Agree to draw their own experiences as a parent to determine if the lot sent Menon, family court judges.

? For example find happening is unaware of the judge or single parents appreciate. Good parents, so anyone their children such emotional abuse in obedience to imagine.

? The real alienation and she says ?, battle of divorce and custody of their children is the parent of the target.

Another problem is the lack of instruction on best practices, procedures, rules and the judges.

Various ways of ? Currently, another judge as practice is a little unstable. Take some professional advice; some of don ? 't; read some welfare report; some consider unnecessary. Set of guidelines we think need a drawing We ? ve, and by administrative judges, but still employ Court. Not have agreed to base practice, ? Menon says.

Required basic training on important aspects of sending family law course for Family Affairs to put anyone important to note that there is important, she says.

Seems to prioritize Menon family law, the judge is not felt.

I think they are ? family ? ? Certain procedure are not met; certain basic requirements are not tracked. ?'s too there among many relaxation and judges seem to ? bring…anything goes ? attitude. Posted by ? Menon, threw caution to wind people when it comes to family issues, by following these steps are known carefully for other regions.

Believe should take Singapore Family Court ?'s book leaves Tan.

? Last, Bar Council ?'s law international meeting, had determine speakers from our Singapore Tokyo High Court ?. Because she is not meeting the child psychology and child care professionals in the Singapore talked about most kids who interview family court judges. Child psychologist and welfare officer's cases these... ? depends on the report of true experts in the assessment of child participation.

For the consultant psychologist Valerie Pernet custody conflicts supports the idea of psychologists. You must ? However, evaluation, personality and behaviour prediction training especially in the area. And evaluation interview both parents is this way that will be able to create a profile. Deviant or abusive personality, to identify and more children protected by the system. Challenges and child custody case well at current... done as ? assess ? require?ments of restrictions

However, I feel that parents want to live in kids strongly Pernet interviewed.

? A child that these decisions are ? she highlights please ask to. Has fully reached its potential Developmental ? ly ?, children make good decisions. This is why they are under the care of the parents in the best interest of our hopes, they will be. Teenagers are to take care of their parents, and of decisions must consent. So can children under 12 years old I know what you want? ?

If you select the children she is he or she is more fear of rejection between the stress, trauma, chaos, etc creation is known to be put in the difficult position.

By child protection consultancy Vijayakumari child we believe shouldn't be allowed to determine the custody conflict because he or she lives with whom she or he has coached parents.

Do not allow access to some interim custody with parents, or visit she cooks all kinds of excuses. Children have seen other parents, other parents don't care, or other horror stories may she said in the description. ? A young child who believe. Sometimes, it's grandparents, child... relationship is a teaching of the ?.

Should encourage her, court preparation system is known as specialized social welfare guardians ad litem (GAL) report.

? The GAL is a sound understanding of the considerable experience of the children of qualified social workers and family law. GAL serves wish child ? s, is the best option, verify that clear to the Court. To do this, in the global address list, that some children can spend the time to know you can take the time to trust the people who have never met them, so take some sessions may, child before... ?

Thus, GAL home visits, and find a casual question sometimes speakers outside the House of children, family and child quality time spent or is added. Meet The ? GAL parent to another, meet the members of the family living in the same House, school teachers, children have seen regular doctor based must speak to the grandparents. Parents ? attitude and parenting styles is a consideration... must be taken to the ?.

Pointed out that no Tan, but enough for social workers and experts, and Malaysia to handle these cases.

You must to set up a Malaysia throughout the can with the emergency senior lawyers Sunday Star columnist Roger Tan, family division or court judge of family law to preside expert family law cases.

In 2000, was put on the agenda, so to higher hospital Court Kuala Lumpur moments like this.

Related articles:
Caught in the middle of the child

View the original article here

Children suffer

She him her and her mother happy will be assured interview at one time in his room after custody of A child to the mother should be given family court judge ruled.

In case of another child B defendants and, he was sent to live with her mother and shouted to stay with her father, she goes. Had been convinced that her case the Chief Justice did not believe her testimony, and she had been brainwashed to her father and his relatives.

Family Court judge Malaysia to resolve intractable custody dispute turned General interview.

You can, however, is not much family law experts of this judge child psychology experts and children to harmful when counseling is incredible.

A strong opponent of the one, the Bar Council House is the family law Committee Chairs Lalitha Menon.

"Not being trained in most family judge applies the principles of what you have, look at what they should be, what kind of many child psychology of family issues. Only way, based on interviews with his or her child to what needs can decide? "

Menon child interview the highlight to be easy. "'S is not a simple case of the child a simple question: ' do you like more?? ' or ' anyone else better parents? '

"You must learn to read between the lines to understand they must might have a question or coached the children judge the different architectures have custody, parents are trained, and judges to get the truth. They need more training. 」

Menon has been pushing for training bar family law Committee, the judge can be useful, says.

"You must learn how to recognize them and to understand nuances and deeper issues.

See also family lawyer in this case, enough training does what many more judges difficult sometimes. Many had tough times, "and she notes.

Family law practitioners honey Tan also agree, obviously there isn't some countries family law and law reform (marriage and divorce) Act 1976, mastery.

"Many hours of training; To get the judges hear families with problems they come off the bench criminal bench of civil and industrial. Important judge sent for training to handle can be manually detach from my personal experience has seen objectively what family issues "that thang.

Agree to draw their own experiences as a parent to determine if the lot sent Menon, family court judges.

"For example, find our many judges appreciate that happens not aware or single parents. Good parents, so anyone their children such emotional abuse in obedience to imagine.

"Reality is alienation of divorce and custody battle theme of their child's parents," she says.

Another problem is the lack of instruction on best practices, procedures, rules and the judges.

"As a variety of ways of a judge of another, practice a little instability is currently. Take some professional advice; some do not. Read some welfare report; some consider unnecessary. We painted a set of guidelines we think that managing required and judge submitted previously, but still employ Court. There is no consensus procedures, basic practice "says Menon.

Required basic training on important aspects of sending family law course for Family Affairs to put anyone important to note that there is important, she says.

Seems to prioritize Menon family law, the judge is not felt.

"They are 'family'; And I think certain procedures have not been met. Certain basic requirements are not tracked. In between too much relaxation and judges ' anything goes "attitude that let. Thrown attention wind even for family issues by following these steps known carefully in other regions, "says Menon.

Believe should take Singapore family court book leaves Tan.

"Bar Council legal Conference in the last year was from our speakers, Singapore court family decisions. Because she is not meeting the child psychology and child care professionals in the Singapore talked about most kids who interview family court judges. Their child psychologist, and welfare officers, in these cases involved children depends on the real experts like the evaluation report. 」

For the consultant psychologist Valerie Pernet custody conflicts supports the idea of psychologists. "But must be a forecast of their territories in particular personality traits or behavior. And evaluation interview both parents is this way that will be able to create a profile. Deviant or abusive personality, to identify and more children protected by the system. Is now the challenge and child custody cases have also been made assess-require?ments of limits "

However, I feel that parents want to live in kids strongly Pernet interviewed.

"Child is asked to make these decisions" she emphasizes. "Developmental-ly, children good decisions possible maximum not reached. This is why they are under the care of the parents in the best interest of our hopes, they will be. Teenagers are to take care of their parents, and of decisions must consent. Children under 12 years old I know what they want to you can it? "

If you select the children she is he or she is more fear of rejection between the stress, trauma, chaos, etc creation is known to be put in the difficult position.

By child protection consultancy Vijayakumari child we believe shouldn't be allowed to determine the custody conflict because he or she lives with whom she or he has coached parents.

Do not allow access to some interim custody with parents, or visit she cooks all kinds of excuses. Children have seen other parents, other parents don't care, or other horror stories may she said in the description. "Believe young children. Sometimes, to grandparents children coaching relationship.

Should encourage her, court preparation system is known as specialized social welfare guardians ad litem (GAL) report.

"Gal qualified social workers child matters in a sound understanding of family law and considerable experience. GAL's role is kid's wish is the best option to Court clearly has. Global address list to do this may take several sessions can take a long time have never met some children ago this child who to trust, so that should spend the time to find out. "

Thus, GAL home visits, and find a casual question sometimes speakers outside the House of children, family and child quality time spent or is added. "Grandparents the story doctor family GAL living in individually meet the parents, the same House members to meet school teachers have seen children on a regular basis also. You should consider parents ' attitudes and parenting styles. "

Pointed out that no Tan, but enough for social workers and experts, and Malaysia to handle these cases.

You must to set up a Malaysia throughout the can with the emergency senior lawyers Sunday Star columnist Roger Tan, family division or court judge of family law to preside expert family law cases.

In 2000, was put on the agenda, so to higher hospital Court Kuala Lumpur moments like this.

--Star-Asia News Network

View the original article here