A draft Act of the legislature of the State of South Dakota is stirring debate well.
House Bill 1255 would provide for the award of joint physical custody of children in certain circumstances.
The Bill suggests that what is most important in the decisions of the guard is the interest of the parents.
South Dakota has already operated under the standard that custody decisions must take into consideration what is most important for the child.
Opinions in the House and the Senate are divided, but some manufacturers of said law that they do not think that the Bill takes everything into account.
Representative David Lust said: "I think that the concept of joint parenting is something which will be supported by all." The best unit is parental units, mother and father together. What I accept now is to interest before parents of the child. ?
The fate of this Bill will be decided in the Senate this week.
If it passes, parents must partager physical custody of the child.
Some lawyers say that the Bill will create an unnecessary amount of instability in the life of the child.
Family law lawyer Debra Watson said, "the concept looks good in a perfect world, but in reality it does not work." In most cases, a parent or another is mainly responsible for children. Sometimes we see parental shared. And where it is already occurring, it will continue. "But if it does not occur, it is not good to make the change when the child is already going through stress and trauma of their parents separating".
Prosecutor Glen Brenner State of County of Pennington said: "we see lots of domestic violence in our Office that comes in." Often the conflicts we see are divorced parents. The shame of those is the impact it has on children. We are a State generally made in the best interests of children, and I think it is.
Watson, says in this age, about 40% of all the birth of the child, which is marriage. This adds another level of complication in determining custody issues.
沒有留言:
張貼留言