1 in 4 Girls and 1 in 6 Boys will be Sexually Abused before they turn 18. The median age is 9. Learn upbeat, non-threatening ways to teach kids to be safe both online and in person without making them afraid. Fun & Empowering for toddlers to teens!
was Mr Gibson Court for the latest custody hearing actor Mel Gibson and his former girlfriend to court to rule on custody of your eight-month-old baby gone.A hearing was apparently threatened in Los Angeles days after alleged recordings of Mr Gibson Oksana Grigorieva have been posted to a US website.
Police evaluate claims that the actor reportedly Ms. Grigorieva during argument in January met.
The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department said audio recordings after the custody hearing had received.
A spokesman said investigators would try to authenticate the recordings, but declined to say how much audio from the Court received.
Offensive language
The RadarOnline Web site has posted a series of shots it claimed tapes, Mr. Gibson's phone calls.
While one can a man Ms. Grigorieva to say he thought that was you dressing too provocative use explicit and offensive language heard.
At one point, Ms. Grigorieva raises the man "beat a woman holding a child in your hands is". He replies "it deserves you".
It is unclear whether the shots of detectives are received, posted by RadarOnline.
Mr. Gibson, whose Filme are Braveheart and lethal weapon, and Ms. Grigorieva have locked in custody disputes through its subsidiary for several weeks.
The couple deal is a confidential custody earlier in the year after she broke, but the matter is now decided by a family law judge.
Investigators, including detectives who investigate possible child abuse visited the latest consultation as well as several sheriff's lawyers for both sides.
Sheriff's spokesman Steve Whitmore declined to say whether Mr. Gibson had extended the investigation.
"I'm not going in to get why you are there", he said detectives of the special victims Bureau.
Award-winning writer Kim Edwards?s The Memory Keeper?s Daughter is a brilliantly crafted family drama that explores every mother?s silent fear: what would happen if you lost your child and she grew up without you? On a winter night in 1964, Dr. David Henry is forced by a blizzard to deliver his own twins. His son, born first, is perfectly healthy. Yet when his daughter is born, he sees immediately that she has Down?s syndrome. Rationalizing it as a need to protect Norah, his wife, he makes a split second decision that will alter all of their lives forever. He asks his nurse to take the baby away to an institution and never to reveal the secret. But Caroline, the nurse, cannot leave the infant. Instead, she disappears into another city to raise the child herself. So begins this beautifully told story that unfolds over a quarter of a century in which these two families, ignorant of each other, are yet bound by David Henry?s fateful decision that long-ago winter night.
A rich and deeply moving page-turner, The Memory Keeper?s Daughter captures the way life takes unexpected turns and how the mysterious ties that hold a family together help us survive the heartache that occurs when long-buried secrets burst into the open. It is an astonishing tale of redemptive love.
Price: $24.95
Today, most of the young married couples who are on the course of divorce merely think that with divorce they will rid all the miseries and unevenness they are facing in life but, Alas! They are greatly mistaken. Divorce just doesn't end everything about a marriage, although it ends the legal contract between a husband and a wife but, it shatters the household that was based on that marriage. It also cannot break the relationship that the children of the marriage create merely by existing.
A marriage is a legal contract, and in general in every legal contract all the parties' rights must be respected.
When we talk about rights after divorce, it involves many aspects of divorce. And in United States it varies from state to state. Divorce rights principally imply each party's right at the time of divorce. There has been a significant change in divorce rights throughout the history and we still find these rights unstable today. For every divorcing couple, to better understand and maximize their divorce rights, they must take assistance of a trained professional family law attorney. These experts can guide in a better way and let you be aware of your divorce rights that are according to your specific circumstances and the laws that govern divorce in their state of residence.
Some of the commonly identified divorce rights involve distribution of property, child custody, child support, alimony (spousal support), and child visitation.
Distribution of Property: when entering into a divorce, diversion of property is a great concern of both the couples. If they both were able to reach to a settlement, OK, else the court shall decide the distribution of the property. This distribution is generally based on either community property or equitable distribution. These statuary schemes may differ from state to state.
Under community property law (which is observed in few states) the marital property is divided equally as both the spouses are taken equal contributors. According to this law distribution doesn't imply to some of the property that is gifted, inheritance granted, purchased before marriage, and/or property that is excluded by prenuptial agreement.
Equitable distribution law is comparatively more common. The term doesn't mean equal but the fair distribution. This law allows courts more flexibility in fine-tuning property distribution to consider and take care of individual cases. The court shall consider the some factors when equitable distribution is carried out which includes; non-marital property, length of the marriage, health and age of both the spouses, income and earning capacity, who earned the property, debts and liabilities of the both the spouses, tax consequences, premarital agreements, present value of the property and any other applicable factor.
- Child Custody: is the most controversial aspect of divorce cases today. No parent has got the right to pawn child in divorce proceedings and negotiate over the issue if both the parents are equally likely to acquire the custody. Only the court has got the jurisdiction to decide over this issue. Child custody rights are awarded based on the best interests of the children involved. Child custody rights and responsibilities point out who will have legal and physical custody of the child. Child support payments will also be determined where applicable in child custody rights cases. Child custody may be legal or physical. The later one seems perfect but, has serious drawbacks as well.
Court today shall decide to award joint legal custody to the spouses, with sole physical custody to one of the spouses and fair visitation rights to the non-custodial parent.
In very rare situation, where neither parent is capable of being an effective parent, the court shall refuse to award the custody and in its place shall award the custody to another family member or in extreme cases to court appointed foster parent.
- Alimony or Spousal Support: is the amount of money one spouse is legally required to pay to the other in a divorce agreement. It may be periodically or in a lump sum, for a specified or for an indefinite term. Alimony and child support are the two main financial issues after custody is awarded. Alimony law differs from state to state.
Tax issues are also import in this matter. Alimony, unlike child support, is taxable to the person receiving the payment, and deductible by the person making the payment. The mode can be cash including checks and money orders. There different types of Alimony award. Most states allow lump sum payment but, is risky as the circumstances of receiving party may change needing additional amount.
- Child Support: is the amount of money paid by a non-custodial parent to a custodial parent for supporting the children after divorce. There are several factors on the basis of which the payment is determined. Child support payments are not tax subjected by neither party (payer to payee). A payment may be treated as fixed child support even if other separate payments are specifically designated as child support.
Each state court shall base the child support decision (as it varies from state to state) on the basis of child support guidelines. Some states base it on specific percentage of non custodial parent's income whereas the others base it on percentage that is the effect of the combined income of both the parents that determines the over all need of the child.
For a parent who exercises regular visitation, the child support amount may be decreased in order to allow that parent to provide for the need of the child directly during the visitation hours.
- Visitation: is the time or schedule that determined by the both the spouses and the court to the non custodial parent in order to visit his/her child on defined intervals (daily, weekly, or other periodic). Although visitation rights are generously awarded, a custodial parent can limit the visitation right by petitioning the court if finds out the visitation can harm the children.
Today there is found an emerging trend among all states of the US in granting visitation rights to other family members such as grandparents and others like stepparents and foster parents. With this new form of law, these members have legally enforceable visitation rights.
In addition to these issues roused in every divorce case, there is another issue that can also be observed sometimes.
- Marital Debts: is also one of the major issues of conflict between divorcing couples. In al most all states the court is authorized to decide the division of debts and assets irrespective of whose name the debts are and who is at the fault in divorce agreement. Both the spouses are to decide the debts settlement if not so; the court will divide debts on equitable basis. Factors considered at the time of debts division are both the spouses' incomes, level of education, being custodial or non custodial, future earning power, and on the basis the parties' enjoyed life before they were divorced.
Ismail Ahmed is a Legal Advisor and SEO based Content Writer of http://www.aboutdivorce.org
Originally broadcast on the multi-award-winning family series, WonderWorks, this thoughtful drama is based on Barbara Dana's acclaimed young adult novel that views divorce from a child's perspective. Fifteen-year-old Chris Mills (Mark Paul Gosselaar, N.Y.P.D. Blue) decides to sue his parents to stop their divorce. He hires an eccentric and idealistic mechanic and licensed lawyer, Archie Corelli (Alan Arkin) to take his case.Price: $14.99
Nancy you are the most wonderful new Rocking Wheel ever. I watch all your shows and decided that I need your help.
In helping plan Sept. 11 in Tel Aviv, 2010 I found my daughter and son-in-law deceased in the bedroom they shared in our House. Had a Baby girl 5 month Lilly Ann Morgan was 5 months old at the time, they will never know her parents.
My issue is that this has become a battle between the estranged brother Kevin Allen and his wife a new Jill Allen. Have the file for approval on my granddaughter is all I have left my daughter of the deceased.
At a hearing Kevin Allen has notified Congress that I would never be allowed to see her again due to the fact that because "alleged child molestation" to me as a small girl.
It is true that I could go into detail about the horrible situation.? The guardian At Litem Amy Scholar out of Savanna, IL is totally against me after Lilly back and cannot understand why. I am a person class to work with a decent job. Kevin and Jill Allen had awarded custody and be allowed to leave with her Florida with perfect strangers, Kevin is foreign to me. And the new time, the first woman who I have seen was in Court on Jan. 13, 2011.
I am begging for help from anyone to obtain my granddaughter back in family owned too.
Has many extended family, we will miss with all their heart. I miss her so much, you are not sure how I'm taking care of only by the power of God.
Please, Nancy help with this issue.? There was dirty work in the system that a court may allow. Someone is paying someone else or something happens.? I have a lawyer, but I wasn't satisfied with actions in court, and will be looking for a new one. "
If there is any way I could get this story out there, this means the world to me to have Lilly Ann back to my arms, vibration, singing. laughing and playing with her.
Thank you very much for your time and hopefully a major consideration in getting this out there. Please.
She him her and her mother happy will be assured interview at one time in his room after custody of A child to the mother should be given family court judge ruled.
In case of another child B defendants and, he was sent to live with her mother and shouted to stay with her father, she goes. Had been convinced that her case the Chief Justice did not believe her testimony, and she had been brainwashed to her father and his relatives.
Family Court judge Malaysia to resolve intractable custody dispute turned General interview.
You can, however, is not much family law experts of this judge child psychology experts and children to harmful when counseling is incredible.
A strong opponent of the one, the Bar Council House is the family law Committee Chairs Lalitha Menon.
"Not being trained in most family judge applies the principles of what you have, look at what they should be, what kind of many child psychology of family issues. Only way, based on interviews with his or her child to what needs can decide? "
Menon child interview the highlight to be easy. "'S is not a simple case of the child a simple question: ' do you like more?? ' or ' anyone else better parents? '
"You must learn to read between the lines to understand they must might have a question or coached the children judge the different architectures have custody, parents are trained, and judges to get the truth. They need more training. 」
Menon has been pushing for training bar family law Committee, the judge can be useful, says.
"You must learn how to recognize them and to understand nuances and deeper issues.
See also family lawyer in this case, enough training does what many more judges difficult sometimes. Many had tough times, "and she notes.
Family law practitioners honey Tan also agree, obviously there isn't some countries family law and law reform (marriage and divorce) Act 1976, mastery.
"Many hours of training; To get the judges hear families with problems they come off the bench criminal bench of civil and industrial. Important judge sent for training to handle can be manually detach from my personal experience has seen objectively what family issues "that thang.
Agree to draw their own experiences as a parent to determine if the lot sent Menon, family court judges.
"For example, find our many judges appreciate that happens not aware or single parents. Good parents, so anyone their children such emotional abuse in obedience to imagine.
"Reality is alienation of divorce and custody battle theme of their child's parents," she says.
Another problem is the lack of instruction on best practices, procedures, rules and the judges.
"As a variety of ways of a judge of another, practice a little instability is currently. Take some professional advice; some do not. Read some welfare report; some consider unnecessary. We painted a set of guidelines we think that managing required and judge submitted previously, but still employ Court. There is no consensus procedures, basic practice "says Menon.
Required basic training on important aspects of sending family law course for Family Affairs to put anyone important to note that there is important, she says.
Seems to prioritize Menon family law, the judge is not felt.
"They are 'family'; And I think certain procedures have not been met. Certain basic requirements are not tracked. In between too much relaxation and judges ' anything goes "attitude that let. Thrown attention wind even for family issues by following these steps known carefully in other regions, "says Menon.
Believe should take Singapore family court book leaves Tan.
"Bar Council legal Conference in the last year was from our speakers, Singapore court family decisions. Because she is not meeting the child psychology and child care professionals in the Singapore talked about most kids who interview family court judges. Their child psychologist, and welfare officers, in these cases involved children depends on the real experts like the evaluation report. 」
For the consultant psychologist Valerie Pernet custody conflicts supports the idea of psychologists. "But must be a forecast of their territories in particular personality traits or behavior. And evaluation interview both parents is this way that will be able to create a profile. Deviant or abusive personality, to identify and more children protected by the system. Is now the challenge and child custody cases have also been made assess-require?ments of limits "
However, I feel that parents want to live in kids strongly Pernet interviewed.
"Child is asked to make these decisions" she emphasizes. "Developmental-ly, children good decisions possible maximum not reached. This is why they are under the care of the parents in the best interest of our hopes, they will be. Teenagers are to take care of their parents, and of decisions must consent. Children under 12 years old I know what they want to you can it? "
If you select the children she is he or she is more fear of rejection between the stress, trauma, chaos, etc creation is known to be put in the difficult position.
By child protection consultancy Vijayakumari child we believe shouldn't be allowed to determine the custody conflict because he or she lives with whom she or he has coached parents.
Do not allow access to some interim custody with parents, or visit she cooks all kinds of excuses. Children have seen other parents, other parents don't care, or other horror stories may she said in the description. "Believe young children. Sometimes, to grandparents children coaching relationship.
Should encourage her, court preparation system is known as specialized social welfare guardians ad litem (GAL) report.
"Gal qualified social workers child matters in a sound understanding of family law and considerable experience. GAL's role is kid's wish is the best option to Court clearly has. Global address list to do this may take several sessions can take a long time have never met some children ago this child who to trust, so that should spend the time to find out. "
Thus, GAL home visits, and find a casual question sometimes speakers outside the House of children, family and child quality time spent or is added. "Grandparents the story doctor family GAL living in individually meet the parents, the same House members to meet school teachers have seen children on a regular basis also. You should consider parents ' attitudes and parenting styles. "
Pointed out that no Tan, but enough for social workers and experts, and Malaysia to handle these cases.
You must to set up a Malaysia throughout the can with the emergency senior lawyers Sunday Star columnist Roger Tan, family division or court judge of family law to preside expert family law cases.
In 2000, was put on the agenda, so to higher hospital Court Kuala Lumpur moments like this.
--Star-Asia News Network
Grandparents' Rights Concerning Their Grandchildren-Contains All States and All Options. This is the most complete volume of information on this very important subject. Child Custody Affiliate Site: http://www.custodylibrary.org/affiliate/index.html
Hey Beautiful!
I? wanted to write this email so that both you and your twin sister and? anybody else in your family who is aware of the situation knows that I? understand your twin sister, but I am not the least bit sympathetic. She? deserves every bit of misery she has ever experienced and deserves? every bit more headed in her direction.
First off, let me start? by saying were not for the contributions of Mr. Goldfish, her childhood? pet who met such an untimely demise, figuring out this puzzle would not? be possible. Wherever you are Mr. Goldfish, we thank you for your? assistance in this matter and are sorry for the pain and anguish you? suffered after being forced to leave the pet store that was your home as? my wife's twin sister's pet. It was your curse to be her pet Mr.? Goldfish, but you bore it well, up through the bitter end. You are, er? were a model of courage that other goldfish can only aspire to. You will? always be remembered as being a helper, a knowledge-bringer and a? savior (of sorts). Rest easy, Mr. Goldfish. The troubling details? surrounding your death have finally come to light and justice is at? hand. ??
Your? twin sister told me that she took a bite out of Mr. Goldfish before? flushing him outside CT2, because she was a kid and kids do stupid shit? sometimes (does she like sushi?) I decided to ignore it because I've? heard far worse. But in retrospect, your sister had A LOT of anger, even? back when she was a kid, and poor Mr. Goldfish paid the ultimate price.?
When I was talking to Ashland Colin back in '95 (the dad of? both of you), he introduced you as his daughter, but refused to? acknowledge your twin sister as anything but a relative- he didn't even? want to label her as a niece (and understandably so). When I asked him? why, he said it was because she's a whore. When I asked how he could be? so sure at such an early age, he said the easiest way to illustrate it? was the tale of Mr. Goldfish, which he proceeded to share over a few? cigarettes. I've filled in some of the details with the information I've? gathered myself from being around your twin sister and from a few other? sources, but here's the gist of it (and why the vast majority of whores? who can change bit don't are excuses wrapped in other excuses wrapped? in yet other excuses- a sentiment I share with your dad who verbalized? it the same way back in '95.
The gist of it was that Mr.? Goldfish died because you twin sister refused to read the book that was? given to her regarding the care of Mr. Goldfish- I think I had the same? one when I had goldfish (mine did better). Did you guys buy the fish and? the book from Animal World in Skokie or Morton Grove? Damn. That means? that Mr. Goldfish might have been a relative of some of my goldfish-? which makes me even angrier at the fate he suffered. Now it's a duty to? bring this bitch's crimes to light.
My biggest question after? hearing about the ugly circumstances surrounding the death of Mr.? Goldfish was why wouldn't she read the book?
Your dad shared the? answers in the same way he learned them, to show me why he came up with? the whole "a whore is an excuse wrapped in another excuse wrapped in? another excuse" definition.
Her first excuse was some kind of? non-conformist bullshit that caused her to say that not reading the book? was a way to "fight the power," which was her first excuse to fail but? bought her some respect from certain like-minded individuals who? probably regret supporting her stance on Mr. Goldfish.
Ashland? Colin's final statement was that she won't do anything that is good for? her- even if she knows it. He couldn't reveal more without going into? details that are unseemly over a smoke on the porch on a nice afternoon? in Ashland, VA. But now I have the rest of the pieces of the puzzle.
Another? example Ashland Colin used to illustrate his point about your twin? sister was the incident where she coked something awful and everybody? hated it so much that they were mean to her and told her to not even try? in the future- which served as another excuse in the many layers of? excuses she was building for herself.
Why all these different layers of bullshit?
Because,
Another? layer of bullshit (but one of the first designed to make people feel? sorry for her): Your twin sister claimed to be "afraid to try" - she? claims that she would rather not try and fail because of the "hurtful? people out there" who judge her and prefers to not try and fail by? default so that when people hear about it, they just shake their heads? and leave her alone not thinking she's worth the effort- she ain't, but? it's a good thing a few people were paying attention for the sakes of? her victims (much, much worse than Mr. Goldfish- she began doing the? same things that she did to Mr. Goldfish to other human beings). This? was Ashland Colin's worst nightmare- he predicted that she would grow up? to be a serial killer or some other form of degenerate (actually she's a? few kinds of degenerate rolled into one) but made sure to tell me that? he would pray for her and hope she righted her course in life before? something terrible happened- but doubted that his prayers would be? answered. When I asked him why he wasn't trying to explain things to? your twin sister because he had survived his ordeal with meth, had? served in the military and earned an honorable discharge, and was now a? college student at a good school, maybe he had more credibility than? before and would listen now. He said he had tried, but she didn't want? to listen- she just wanted to be a whore and so he would do all he could? do- pray for her and keep his fingers crossed whle hoping for the best,? but he didn't want her anywhere near him.
Now, considering how? low her life was in Denver, that excuse doesn't make much sense- when? you work at a strip club and have sex and eat the shit from a public? toilet at the strip club in exchange for a $20 bag of bad cocaine and? everybody knows about it because it happened in public in the general? view of the other employees and patrons of the club, EVERYBODY AND THEIR? MAMA knows that said individual IS NOT WORRIED ABOUT people judging? because she tried and failed. That stage of life (if it ever existed for? her) was left behind a long, long, LONG time ago.
So, we can? establish that even though she's miserable, she doesn't want to try? because she prefers when everybody around her does things for her that? she should handle- which alienates people, and causes them to leave her? alone- which is what she wants- it helps cover up her crimes and makes? things easier if everybody chalks up her uselessness to being a stripper? and stops paying her attention- a trick she picked up from her mother.
Yet? another layer of your twin sister's bullshit designed to cause people? to leave her alone: She decided that she just wouldn't do what she's? supposed to do, because she doesn't want to put in the effort, meaning? she's lazy. She's aware of and knows about the problems with her life,? but refuses to put the effort in to fix them anyway, AND she tells? people that she hates herself because of it- giving the people of the? general public yet another reason to ignore her, which makes it easier? for her to be a pedophile serial killer who eats her victim's flesh-? similar to Jeffrey Damer. Her whole life is a cover-up.?
Your? twin sister is well aware that nobody will want to marry her unless she? put in effort into fixing herself, but claims to be so lazy that she? won't do it. She tells people that she's waiting for somebody who will? marry her and still be willing to do everything for her and treat her? like a kid- which explains her closeness to her family (you all put up? with her bullshit even though you don't like it, yet even you all refuse? to do everything for her the same way as when she was two years old).? You either put up with her and ignore her (like yourself and Colin? Olmstead) or are accomplices- like your younger sister. Lots of women? use sex to get what they want- it's somewhat instinctive, even in the? animal kingdom- the behavior is exhibited by many different females of? many different species. But we are humans- best exemplified by the? dialogue between Robin Williams talking to Ben Stiller in the movie? "Night at the Museum" remember when the little monkey stole Stiller's? keys and Stiller started slapping the little critter in the face, only? to have the monkey slap him back? Leading to Robin Williams character (I? think he was playing a wax statue of Ulysses S. Grant) discovering what? was happening, and putting a stop to it by asking Stiller's character:? "Who is evolved? Who is the member of the evolved species of primate?? Who is evolved?- You are evolved- so the responsibility of doing better? is yours." ha ha ha ha ha That's one of the funniest movie scenes I've? ever seen in my life. But the point is is that there is no justification? for this kind of behavior in the animal kingdom ie there's no? justification for acting like a whore who'll fuck anybody so nobody pays? attention to her while she's abducting, torturing, and killing small? children. It makes the whores who do that for real look REAL bad.?
A few other illuminating details regarding your twin sister that people may not understand:
Why? does she enjoy anal sex? Initially, she tried it because it was? available and sex defined her life- with her mother with her youngest? sister, etc. Her Catholic upbringing (the church telling people "don't? do it, it's evil!) only made it more fun for her. She tried it and? probably enjoyed it which is why she kept doing it, which (unto itself)? doesn't make anybody evil- lots of straight hetero couples do the same? without hurting anybody. (P.S. I don't have any fixation on it, don't? hate it or love it and have no motivation to defend it- I understand? your twin, which doesn't help her in the least, but don't want you to? think bad stuff like I'm an anal sex addict or something because of my? opinion).
Hmmm... A (somewhat strong) hypothesis regarding? your twin's behavior: Catholic religion frowns heavily on both anal sex? and homosexual relationships (maybe not anymore, but it did- don't know? what present position of the Vatican is on anal sex). The? molestation/incest she was exposed to as a young child was homosexual in? nature (Zoe admitted to it, not proud of herself but was trying the? best she could and trying to improve- "Jessica suffered a lot" were? Zoe's own words). So, little kid has incestuous & homosexual sex at? home from an early age, then little kid goes to Church on Sundays where? homosexual sex wrong, but she's "doing a well as everybody else" in her? view then. Hears that anal sex also a no-no, but since homosexual sex? hasn't killed her and she's "doing as well as everybody else" back then,? decided to try anal sex with same result. Still too young to understand? that she's actually not doing as well as everybody else b/c she's? "happy" (more or less re: Mr. Goldfish). Has anybody heard that Nirvana? song "Dumb?" We've all felt the same way from time to time, but not like? your reject twin sister.
Grew older, realized that she's NOT? "doing as well as everybody else" & doesn't even have the ability to? fool herself anymore- other people and society made sure of that. Her? illusion (much like Mr. Goldfish) is dead. She's a young bisexual woman? who enjoys anal sex, and is a pedophile who not only enjoys sex with? underage children, but little kids- which caused her mother to throw her? out. She's smart enough to know that the Church was wrong about anal? sex and homosexual relationships (maybe she experienced religious? confusion- might have considered different religion or atheism at this? point- probably atheism- she was aware by now that no God from any? culture accepted her). However she's mad at everybody for killing her? illusion that pedophilia is ok and she's like everybody else. Used to be? able to fool herself that's she's happy back when she didn't have to? make any effort and everybody did things for her, and she wasn't aware? of how society would treat her pedophile sexual preferences (kinda like? how my life was before I figured out what it meant to be brown). When? she got older, she's still miserable, but when people do things for her? it makes her feel good (not happy, but kinda sorta like it) because it? takes her back to her early years when the illusion of happiness was? still working via no effort and everything is getting done and nobody is? judging her for being a pedophile. Unfortunately for her, that illusion? of happiness is the best she ever could do- she never was truly happy? and she never can be. Truth: She's so miserable b/c of reality that when? she releases the links to her childhood and the illusion of happiness? it provided, she is unable to cope with her distress and ends up trying? to recreate childhood illusion the best she can- by getting others to do? the things she should do for herself and by having sex with small? children). This psychology led to whore behavior and the whore label for? her. Working as a stripper didn't help- it just provided more reasons? to label her as a whore. Her looks made it worse, because that allowed? her to meet individuals who did things for her that she should be doing? for herself in exchange for sex, which was her cover so people didn't? know she is a pedophile. Even though her intelligence is questionable? (she only got through the tenth grade and reads at the third grade level? because the kids she takes advantage of and subsequently kills are very? small children who understand even less), she wants people to think? that she knows the people she ends up with are no good, but has decided? that she is willing to be with them in exchange for them helping her? recapture the childhood illusion via everybody does everything for her =? roots of her whore behavior. Tragic part of her story: she couldn't? overcome the distress caused by putting in some honest effort to save? her own life, is her own responsibility b/c she's simply too weak. When? the truth is that she's just a pedophile who abducts children from the? toy store (I guess the younger they are the better she likes them, as in? the case of her friend Whitney's kid who was still in diapers) and? molests and kills them, which is why she makes sure that people know? she's a dumb shit coke whore- so that they don't bother looking any? deeper.
Her brain's self-defense mechanism that prevents her from? ever truly enjoying her sick, perverted life (due in large part to the? teachings of the Catholic Church): Even though she's a perverted? individual with no sense of morals, somewhere deep inside her brain, she? knows that pedophilia and having sex with kids and torture and murder? are wrong, and that tiny part of her brain keeps fighting desperately to? prevent her from falling into her illusions and losing herself? completely in pedophilia and murder and torture and eating small? children- all human brains have this "wiring" in order to prevent? dementia and insanity (or further damage of insane {not in a legal? sense} acts) that falling into her illusion would cause. She? works/worked as a stripper so many different individuals find her? attractive (ugh), otherwise that job would be impossible to have-? leading to "relationships" and sexual encounters with a variety of? individuals who are willing to do some of the things she should do for? herself and help her hold onto her childhood illusion in exchange for? sex- which explains her many sexual partners. One person might do one? thing or (at most) a few things for her in exchange for a sexual? encounter (like buy dinner and take her to a movie) or two. A? "relationship" (to her) just means that this person will continue to do? the the few things she should be doing for herself in exchange for? repeated sexual encounters. Now, if she needs everything she should be? doing for herself to be done by others, and most people only do a few? things, then she needs to be with more people so that she can get more? of the things she should be doing for herself done for her and grab as? much of her childhood illusion of happiness as possible. Now we know why? she has so many sexual partners- which is all a cover so that people? don't pay attention to her because they think she's a coke whore who? fucks everybody while she's busy covering up the truth about being a? pedophile who abducts and murders small children- which is what she's? been doing for years, which is why she doesn't qualify for the insanity? defense- because she knows everything she's doing is wrong (evidenced by? the cover-up). If she knows what she's doing is wrong and proves it by? trying to cover it up, she ain't insane in a legal sense- which might? ruin her day, but cheers and brightens mine :-)
Your twin sister? had so many sexual partners thanks to her appearance and finds grabbing? onto her childhood illusion of happiness is possible- but can't escape? the fact that it was all an illusion back then AND now- which she? became? aware of when eating a little of Mr. Goldfish before throwing? him away- something that causes her pain and forces her to realize that? she is desperately unhappy, was desperately unhappy even when "things? were great," and can't force society to accept pedophilia as a lifestyle? that should be as accepted as being a homosexual or bisexual on the? basis of her physical appearance. Doing things that she finds? disgusting, like eating some of Mr. Goldfish and later, eating feces? (bathroom sex) is a mechanism of her brain (it's part of the? hard-wiring, she can't get rid of it) "protecting her" and telling her? to not fall into the illusion that her life is ok and to expend the? effort to fix her life. What happens when a person puts their hand into a? hot open flame? They get burned and they remove their hand so that the? pain goes away, and in the future, don't put their hands into open? flames to avoid the pain it caused the first time. This is EXACTLY what? your sister was trying to do, but on a psychological level- she felt so? helpless since childhood because she's always felt unable to fix the? problems in her life. Unfortunately, she found a different illusion that? served as her excuse to not improve- that she's helpless, which pissed? people off almost as much and made people think she's that much more? useless, because if people got through this new and improved layer of? bullshit they wouldn't bother to get past the other ones because she's? just a coke whore stripper who doesn't matter- leaving her free to? molest and murder small children from toy stores nationwide (if it? sounds funny, it's not meant to). She's a stripper, she reads at a 3rd? grade level, she has no bank account, she has no car, etc the list goes? on and on (which are choices she made to feed her illusion/cover of? helplessness- which she ain't, which helps feed her illusion/cover of? childhood happiness which helps her avoid detection). It's like the? layers on a (rotten) onion. Her brain KNOWS that her life is fucked up? and is aware of her illusions/covers and is also aware of her choice to? not try because it makes her so miserable to let go of that illusion of? being happy being a pedophile in secret and to have to understand that? her physical appearance IS NOT NEARLY enough to make people accept her? choice to have sex with very small children. So, her brain (or some part? of it) is as alarmed by her condition as the rest of the people who? know her are and (unfortunately) KNOWS that she ISN'T helpless no matter? how she feeds her illusions/covers. So, in an effort to "right the? ship" and get things headed in the right direction, her brain directs? her to engage in acts that she finds repulsive- like eating feces which? (that little part of her brain hopes) will cause her enough pain so that? she breaks free of using her illusions to justify herself and fixes? everything- much like the person who pulls their hand out of the fire in? order to stop the pain. Unfortunately, the human brain is also? hard-wired to adapt to the various stresses placed on it, and since? eating feces and bathroom sex didn't cause enough pain to make her? destroy that "helpless" illusion and get her to get things going in the? right direction, her brain went a few steps further trying to do the? same thing- which phases in eating people and being like Hannibal? Lechter. The human brain is truly amazing (in both a positive and a? negative light). All the crap she did was because she wanted to force? herself to get her shit together. But the part of her brain that adapts? combined with the part that is unable to let go of her illusions and? justifications that she created as a kid beat the part that did stuff? like eat feces trying to get her to wake the fuck up. I'm not sure what? made her decide to stop stripping and try to get her life "together" in? LA, She must have realized that we were close to getting married and? decided to take off and run in order to evade capture and if she could? get away with it, ruin our life together- which is where the suicide? pacts with so many people come from. Damn, she REALLY IS stupidest? retard ever born. And she thought she could get away with all of it-? including trying to kill me because of the way people stereotype? strippers. The BIG mistake that your twin sister and accomplices made? was trying to mess with me- that was what killed them (because you love? me so much). And the stuff she's done will piss people off so much that? she knew that when I bring the heat, she'll just have no choice but to? kill herself because of all the crappy things she tried to do to me? (make me look like a pedophile, look like a racist, trap you into? leaving me homeless, attempting to murder me, etc) combined with the? crap she already did to cover up her crimes. Getting her life together? in prison won't work because she doesn't want to get better, because she? thinks she's justified in doing what she does even though she knows? having sex with little kids is wrong. So she fucked her life up so bad? because when she got caught (ain't no "if" like she was thinking, never? was- dumb shit? pedophile cunt is arrogant as all hell) she would have? no trouble overcoming her fear of suicide and hurting herself and would? end her life, thus avoiding the consequences of her actions- yet another? defense mechanism of her brain, coming from the same place that got her? started with eating feces and engaging in bathroom sex. Sigh. Lots of? people need motivation in order to succeed, but this is ridiculous. Why? did everything spin so out of control for her? Because after she decided? that she likes pedophilia and it should be widely accepted by society? (something her mother said she might try to accomplish on the basis of? her looks) somewhere in her head she decided that it was ok to hurt? other people because they don't and never will accept pedophilia as a? sexual orientation like homosexual and bisexual and she was especially? bitter because society not only rejected her dumb shit notions on the? acceptability of pedophilia but rejected your twin sister's physical? appearance at the same time -which ruined her life, and will cause her? enormous pain no matter what happens- suicide or prison, unless she's? allowed to get away with it. Then she'll only get worse because that? will only strengthen the wiring in her brain that has decided that? hurting others in order to "spread the gospel" of pedophilia is ok.? Damn. What a retarded pedophile dumb shit.
Sad but True.
And it all became obvious with Mr. Goldfish's death (hee hee hee hee)
Which? was the first time she expressed her unhappiness- at being a child in a? home where all this was occurring- I don't think being a bisexual woman? bugged her, she probably could have dealt with that, but everything? that happened in her (and your) childhood home (being molested, the? relationship between her parents, going to Church and "realizing" that? "God is wrong" about homosexual relationships and anal sex {God doesn't? care about that, God just wants everybody to be a good person, but she? was too young to figure that out and by the time she did, she was unable? to fix it re: Mr. Goldfish so she fooled herself into thinking it's? great and what she wants and had to use her illusions in order to keep? herself alive} and it all snowballed into this. But it didn't happen to? you. Which leads back to Darwin's most famous conclusion: Survival of? the Fittest.
Sexual orientation wasn't the primary issue- she? was angry about the molestation and wanted it to stop because it was? unfair and it hurt her but she couldn't make it stop and the other stuff? going on wasn't great either- and made her crazy (non-legal definition)? and it all led to the present. Sadly, the cliche "If you can't beat? 'em, join 'em" comes to mind- which explains why she hates you so much.? Her unhappiness at being a molested child combined with the other? negative environmental factors present when she was a child are the root? of all her problems. People may rush to blame Zoe (and the people who? raised her) for all of this. But that isn't the truth. You were subject? to the same parents and grew up in the same household and had the same? negative environmental problems in your life, at the same time, but you? navigated through those problems without causing yourself the damage? that your twin sister did to herself. So a lot of it comes down to the? choices that your twin sister made for herself and regrets making. Did? you ever study a legal case involving a person who grows up in a home? where he/she was molested over the course of many, many years? I have.? There are usually only a few counts of molestation for each person that? was molested (if you ever see a case on the news where the assailant has? 200 counts of molestation against them or something like that, you know? that that sick motherfucker should be executed immediately because they? hurt A LOT of different people- not just the same individuals over and? over again. The more typical situation is where the assailant may have? 5-10 charges of molestation tops, and has a WHOLE BIG BUNCH of statutory? rape charges) and if the victim allows it to continue, the prosecutor? stops throwing molestation charges at the assailant and only charges the? assailant with statutory rape because the law accounts for the fact? that if people really want something to stop (in a domestic setting all? other variables held constant) it will and they'll avoid it or whatever? until help arrives. While the law frowns upon children having sex with? adult members of the household, the law doesn't want to legislate the? freedoms of consenting parties {America is the land of the free after? all ha ha ha}, even if one party is ashamed of giving that consent and? wishes they hadn't later, which is why the molestation charges turn into? statutory rape charges)- we are both living examples (but not the only? ones, not even by a longshot) of the validity of this logic, as is your? twin sister using the same logic in reverse. In your twin sister's case,? crimes were most certainly committed against her (such as being? molested), but she consented to it long enough to where choosing? different became an option she did not want for whatever reason (maybe? she has an unnatural fear of foster homes, who knows?). The realization? that she felt that her situation was the best option for her caused her? to become angry (perhaps she was angry she was bisexual, maybe she was? angry that God didn't strike her down for engaging in homosexual sex and? anal sex, maybe she expected more help from other people, perhaps she? hated the fact that the Church was wrong about anal sex and homosexual? sex, maybe she resented her hypothetical fear and resentment of foster? homes, or maybe she just wasn't willing to miss all those episodes of? The Strawberry Shortcake cartoon after school in order to deal with the? mess, maybe all of the above who knows? Point is, she never picked up a? telephone and called anybody in law enforcement for help- isn't? Olmstead's mother a member of the police force? I understand not calling? a cop, but she refused to call her grand-aunt? ?!!?) but my best guess? is she thought about what was happening in her home and decided that she? couldn't change it and that other people didn't do enough to help her? when she had the same rules that were applied to all of us, and decided? to bullshit herself into thinking that she didn't think any of it was? wrong, and she agreed with all of it- and when she saw how other people? and society viewed her, her mother, and the sexual tastes of others like? them, she resented it because she wanted what happened at home to be as? accepted as any other variation on heterosexual relationships were.? Which is impossible to say the least, because many children would be? taken advantage of (for every one child that knowingly and intelligently? consents to this, there are a hundred thousand children who might put a? stop to it but will have to deal with problems they shouldn't have to? because of child molesters and pedophiles for their entire lives- so the? law is correct the way it is. If your twin sister has no problem with? her "lifestyle", she should live her life and not hurt anybody while? doing whatever the fuck she does- which means that there isn't any? involvement by the legal system nor any reason for them to ever be? involved. But to hate society for condemning actions that hurt the vast? majority of all involved and to resent having to keep it private as a? result of her own personal choice and inability to pick up a phone and? call her grand-aunt is stupid arrogant beyond measure. But to continue? down that road and to only realize what a fool you were by hurting? others and "not being able to stop" (translation: not being willing to? stop) made her hate herself to the point where things got this crazy and? this far out of control- because she knew she was wrong all along and? she's continuing to do wrong and won't stop doing wrong and can't stand? herself and so it resulted in this. The best expression of the misery of? your twin sister's life in popular culture is the experiences of the? main character in Fydor Dostoyevsky's masterpiece Crime and Punishment.? Your twin sister is a female version of Raskilnikov. Damn, that must? suck. But it ain't enough. And it all came to the fore because of that? poor pet fish. Your spirit can finally rest peacefully, Mr. Goldfish.? You did you job well.
Mr. Goldfish, you have been avenged!!
Click? on the link below to submit an ANONYMOUS tip to the Los Angeles Police? Department using your computer RIGHT NOW. The website will accept photos? of suspects.
http://www.tipsoft.com/index.asp?P=WebTips
Click on the link below to submit a tip to the FBI. The tip is NOT anonymous and the FBI website DOES NOT accept photos.
THANK YOU ALL.
In California, an assessment 730 can be described as a study Fund and an analysis of a family, their children and s relationship within the family in the context of a dispute over custody of children or visits. 730 Evaluation is also known as an investigation into the custody of children or evaluation of custody of children. 730 evaluations are specific of California "730" number refers to the 730 section of California evidence code in which ordered.
In legal terms, California evidence code section §730 States:
"When appears to the Court, at any time before or during the trial of an action, which tests experts may be required by the Court or to the action, the Court of its own motion or motion of either party may appoint one or more experts to investigate, to process a report can be ordered by the Court and to testify as an expert in the trial of the action on the fact or matter as to which expert evidence is or may be necessary." The Court may fix the compensation for these services, if any, rendered by any person appointed pursuant to this section, click Add ition to any service as a witness in the amount as seems reasonable to the Court. "In this section they interpreted to allow a person to perform any act for which a license is required unless you have the appropriate licence to legally perform this Act."
Usually carried out a 730 evaluation by an "evaluation custody of the child," also known as an evaluator of 730 or custody evaluator. 730 Evaluator role the researcher and look closely at family dynamics that he or she can provide to the Court a 730 evaluation report as evidence to help find the best possible agreement that reflects the best interests of the child to the Court. 730 Evaluation report can be written or oral and 730 evaluator may be called to testify or questioned at trial.
730 Evaluation is generally ordered for a specific purpose and in cases of custody of children of the alto-conflicto or complicated where expert evidence is required. Before accepting a 730 evaluation you should discuss their particular case with a lawyer for family law in your area to help you learn or not a 730 evaluation is the right approach for you.
c 2006 Coach of custody of children
Child custody coach provides information, online materials, and training services to parents in the field of the child custody, divorce, custody of children and visits, the child custody evaluations 730 assessments, upbringing of children and all matters relating to the custody of the child and divorce. "How to win child custody-proven strategies that can win custody and save you thousands in tax cost!" is a strategy guide of custody of only child custody coach-written and made available by the coach of custody of children of an easy way to read, understand and apply format E-Book. Custody party is a consumer online and lawyer for family law that match service to assist you in finding counsel suitable for your divorce or child custody case. Party of custody can help you to find the lawyer of the law of family law, child custody lawyer divorce lawyer in your area.
It's how you can find an excellent lawyer of custody of children of Detroit
You can find the custody of the children of good lawyer s around the world, but find and choose a good lawyer of their crops are a task. You have to spend time and effort if you want your case to be represented by a strong legal professional. If approaching directly an attorney you are sure convince him that he is the person right for the job because he wants his business but you should not take talk of the lawyer to its nominal value. Here is how should go about finding and choosing a good yer family law:
1. References
A way to find a good lawyer is to ask a friend or a relationship if you recommend a legal professional who has done a great job where known case. If any of your friends or relations are satisfied with services of a family law yer, only too happy to introduce you to him. If they have not use the services of a yer family law, but have been a good lawyer who has worked well in another case, still you can derive this lawyer and then you can take a reference of it.
Try to call a paralegal and check with them also. However, recommended the services of only those lawyers who outsource the work.
2 Ads
Verification of the custody of the children's lawyer Detroit yellow pages ads is another option. While you can not imagine that a competent lawyer how is looking at your ad, can find out how much charge, especially the initial consultation rate. Usually family law yers are listed in the section of "lawyer s", also divided into divorce, family law, civil and family law, etc.
3. The Martindale Hubbell Law Directory
Martindale Hubbell Law Directory is a rich source of information of lawyer. It lists close to 800,000 lawyers and information that bears on each list is great. You can get information such as age, grade, the year when the lawyer began the practice that helps to find out how experienced is, bar details of membership of the Association, certification and classifications by peers, which is extremely important that you can find out what they think a lawyer of his ability and his attitude peers.
The same level of rating in Martindale Hubbell Directory law is extremely important. It is divided into two major areas - legal ability and general recommendation. In the section of legal ability ratings take into account the experience, qualifications and the nature of the practice. The range of skills is a C. General recommendation section, lawyers are classified depending on their adherence to professional standards, ethics, diligence, discharge of the responsibilities and how much cling to the code of conduct. The range of A-V skills.
The directory contains lawyers in Michigan custody by city and State. You will find the area of specialization to call one of these lawyers who can make searching for particular lawyer. Martindale Hubbell Law Directory is available in printed form and is also accessible online at http://www.martindale.com. You can pay a visit to the public library or the courthouse law library reference to the printed copy.
4 Ads
Normally, a lawyer of the custody of the children of Detroit announced in magazines, newspapers and in some cases also for Radio and television. It may refer to these ads to find a good family law yer - but no matter how ostentatious are these ads that can not really respond by competition from a lawyer.
It should not be as difficult as it is to win the custody of their children. They are easy to follow and easy to learn about the programs available for you to help you win the and win your custody case. Not simply hear the advice of his lawyer because it may not be enough. Take additional measures, learn appropriate strategies and you will get the knowledge to win the case and custody of their children. More information on these incredible resources here: http://www.child-custody-strategies.com
When parents separate or divorce in California of Los Angeles and custody of the children is discussed, the parties may attend mediation of custody of children in the County of Los Angeles to settle their differences with respect to the custody of the children and visits. Mediation of custody of children in the County of Los Angeles is a form of alternative dispute resolution that can be scheduled by appointment with mediation services in family conciliation courts of Los Angeles County Court.
Issue contested custody of the children in Los Angeles, mediation of custody of children requires that the parties may have an audience of litigation in the Los Angeles family court. In other words, parties must try to first resolve child custody and judge visits disagreements on the mediation of custody of children in Los Angeles before a Superior Court of Los Angeles or Commissioner will hear dispute over custody of the children in a contested hearing.
Normally in mediation of custody of children, both parents must complete a child custody mediation information intake form. Intake form can help the mediator of Los Angeles to learn more about the custody of the children and visitation issues disputed before to meet with parents. The mediator may meet with parents, together or individually and usually will facilitate the discussion attempts to help parents resolve their disputes. In the mediation of custody of children, parties can resolve all, some or none of the custody of the children issues disputed.
In Los Angeles County mediation is confidential, which means that the mediator does not notify the Court that was discussed at the mediation. Mediators may inform the Court of a mutual agreement that has been mutually accepted by both parties. Mediators may recommend an investigation or assessment of custody of children or an Attorney appointed to represent the child. Los Angeles County mediator is mandated reporters of child abuse, meaning that they are required report suspected child abuse to child protection or CPS services.
California family code section 3170-3173 describes the availability of the custody of the mediation and Add resses child custody and visits disputes relating to amendments, domestic violence, adoptions, paternity and stepfather and grandfather of requests. California family code section 3160-3165 describes the General provisions of the mediation of custody of children and its purpose. However, since the specific details of the mediation of custody of children and mediators may differ from a county to County in California and can change over time, you can report at the Los Angeles Superior Justice Palace for more information. In addition, should consult a lawyer for family law, divorce in Los Angeles Attorney or lawyer's divorce from Los Angeles to help you learn more about local processes and local rules for mediation of custody of children and learn whether mediation of custody of the children is the right approach for your situation of custody of children of Los Angeles Los Angeles.
c 2007 Coach of custody of children
Child custody coach provides information, online materials, and training services to parents in the field of the child custody, divorce, custody of children and visits, the child custody evaluations 730 assessments, upbringing of children and all matters relating to the custody of the child and divorce. "How to win the custody - Proven strategies that can win custody and save you thousands in tax cost!"It is a strategy guide for custody of only child custody coach written and made available by the coach of custody of children of an easy way to read, understand and apply format E-Book. Custody party is a consumer online and lawyer for family law that match service to assist you in finding counsel suitable for your divorce or child custody case. Party of custody can help you to find the lawyer of the law of family law, child custody lawyer divorce lawyer in your area.
AMBER alert system, used by law enforcement and broadcasters, is now available at Facebook.Facebook, users can if sign up for AMBER AlertsThe program is named for Amber Hagerman, who was abducted and killed in 1996Some 800,000 children are reported missing each yearWashington (cnn) - warning system child abduction used by ministries of enforcement, broadcasters and transportation law is now available on Facebook.
Alerts AMBER have already been available for many users via their local law of application Facebook pages.
But now, Facebook users can receive advertisements directly state what AMBER Alert pages, by choosing the alerts in the State in which they want to see. District of Columbia and the territories of the United States also have a page alert.
"As we all know, social networking has some limitations, and now the AMBER alerts will benefit from this scope," said Laurie Robinson, the National AMBER Coordinator for the Department of Justice.
La AMBER (America missing: Broadcast Emergency Response) alert system began as an agreement between broadcasters and law enforcement agencies of the Act to release public information on abductions of children so quickly can help citizens in search of the child.
It is named for Amber Hagerman, a 9-year-old in Arlington, Texas, who was kidnapped and murdered in 1996. Facebook announcement comes on the eve of the 15th anniversary of his abduction.
Facebook users who want to receive alerts must be register at http://apps.facebook.com/amber_alert/.
Ernie Allen, President of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, said program designers wanted to be sensitive to people who would see alerts as spam, so users must subscribe to receive alerts.
Once they receive a newsletter, Facebook users can easily share it with their Facebook friends.
Approximately 800,000 children are reported missing each year. The AMBER Alert program has been credited with the resumption of 525 children since its inception.Make 70% on each sale! Parents absolutely Love this product! High converting website, 70% commissions, high converting upsell funnel guarantees big $ CB checks. Parenting/Family/Mothers Market - Basically Anyone With Children Will Buy this
Frankfurt-family court judge agreed to take over a 10-day suspension without pay for judicial misconduct arising from the issue of child custody.
This is the second discipline Gormley Tamra judge district which includes Scott Woodford, Grand Bourbon. In November 2009, Gormley suspended 45 days without pay. I have asked the State Supreme Court to revisit this issue and has not served after that comment.
Rejected by the Commission according to the order of 12 January "Ethics Committee", five charges relating to the three orders of Gormley entered into her designated district prohibits connect children to parents had four consecutive weeks of drug screens clean parents with drug problems. Alleged "Ethics Committee" Gormley has failed to hold hearings to determine whether there is abuse or neglect cases.
Gormley denied those accusations.
Said Jay aingli, Gormley's counsel, that the judge "happy rejected the vast majority of the charges against her.
Aingli said: "the charge remaining one not in any way her legal provision or capacity as a judge."
Gormley delivered to agreed settlement released this week, they fail to Panamanians themselves from cases during a hearing March 11 in Woodford County after the Court of appeal that the appropriate forum for Rowan County.
Gormley said failed to take action even after she received communication from the Commission on 12 July. Set a special issue on Aug. 25.
Gormley arrangement says s/he suspended for ten days without pay at the same time as her comment 45 days. However, the system also says that if the Supreme Court reversed its previous comment must serve Gormley suspended for 10 days.
Aingli added that prepared Gormley to defend herself to remaining charge in the case, but "agreed to settle this issue not extra time so they can put this matter behind them."
This course teaches your child practical critical thinking, decision making and problem solving skills. These are foundational skills every child needs to be successful (no matter what career he/she pursues).
According to the latest survey of young Americans in three of the following pairs of lie yourself about money matters and third parties that have been lied to by marriage.
In money matters related to false will:
Hide (58%), minor concealing (54%) maintain tickets (30%) important hidden (16%) to maintain bank accounts (15%), hide (11%) and concealing income (11%)When found. Results range from:
Loss divorced (16%), films (11%) of the argument (67%) and reliability (42%)Same as somrotnueng found it is adultery.
Sometimes, the revelations lead to divorce
Sometimes the first revelations come in during a divorce
Read for more details: Forbes belongs to the partner cheating on you money? 31% Deception accepted.
State police are investigating an attempted child abduction which took place Monday in the corners of the West.
About 2 h 30, a 10 years walking home from school was arrested on the Avenue de Catherine by a man and a woman in a van, police said. They said the child that her parents were at the hospital and he attempted to him in the vehicle, described as a relatively new red van with a magnet Ribbon from American flag.
The pilot was described as a black man while the front seat passenger was a black woman. A child of two years on the seat back, police said.
If you have information about the incident, call the State police in Endwell 754-2701 or Binghamton State police at 775-1241.
Tina Wallace if worried for the safety of her young son Police have confirmed that they are investigating a series of child kidnapping in east Belfast attempts.PSNI appealed for information about a series of incidents in the areas of Lord Street, Euston Street and Clarawood Park.
They all involve a suspect who tried to coax children of primary school in a silver car.
In the region, parents have criticized police for submissions of removal action.
Tina Wallace, wife of the Ulster Paddy Wallace, rugby player said she heard about the issue on Facebook, not the police.
She told the BBC: "Parents of children in local schools had made posts on Facebook to educate other parents".
"They are quite stunned by the volume of kidnapping attempts in the region, but nobody has been taken."
"My son is only four. It is quite sociable boy, but for me when we I to indicate that it should not talk to strangers. ?
According to the Belfast telegraph one of these incidents involved a nine year old boy, who promised candy if it is mounted in the car.
PatrolsPSNI sector for east Belfast Commander Yvonne Davidson, Chief Inspector insisted police take seriously the question and informed a number of schools in the region on incidents.
Chief Inspector Yvonne Davidson says PSNI hunted the driver of the car involved in alleged abduction submissionsBut she invited parents, do not panic.
She said: "last week we had a small number of incidents involving a vehicle of money and children." We felt it was important to communicate with schools that the children were connected to alert principals.
"We are always actively investigate these incidents." We also had high visibility schools patrols to reassure parents.
"It seems to be a bit of hysteria in and around incidents." No there was no kidnapping, abduction are extremely rare.
"Young children say a car was relieved and someone spoke to them." They rightly title ran and told their parents and they told us.
"We are asking people to be vigilant and this report we."
Police are appealing for anyone information to communicate with them on 0845 600 8000 or by failure anonymously crime 0800 555 111.
Her husband has a lawyer and divorced wife in Minnesota, in 1978.
Family Court Orders to pay $ 20000 husband alimony or spousal support wife.
A year later. Her husband has not paid the debt portion of the alimony.
Husband claims that there is no history to post traumatic stress as a result of regulations as his soldiers. Alcoholism Substance abuse and schizophrenia and depression that those conditions him from compliance with the law or living continuously.
But my wife get her husband's decision for spousal support arrears defined.
(In all more than thirty of them) Limit by and her husband do not pay alimony fixed all outstanding.
Wife sues his again every ten years … as long as they were good for in Minnesota litigation has been limited to ten years will be procedurally in Minnesota.
However, your wife attempt is denied, the last renewal decision with the Court to halt the dismissal.
The location of the husband is that he did not have the ability to pay spousal support orders by the time they have ordered.
It may be appropriate mean that the husband has the ability to present issues in pay.
The main issue in law under the law will seem to be many times support the Minnesota (or for any decisions) may be renewed.
Wife appeals court ruling family to Minnesota Supreme Court's.
Which reverse denial of renewal of decisions with
It attracted and then make the husband ruling.
And now the final resolution of the issue to rest with the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Florida judge may be valid for the period up to twenty years if timely renewal before expiration date.
Read more in the this article [Minneapolis-St. Paul] Pioneer Press: Decade alimony disputes..
The Court of Appeal, composed of Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri, Mr Justice Albert J. Magri and Mr Justice Tonio Mallia, in the case Director for Social Welfare Standards vs “A” (father), on December 3, 2010, held, (among other things), that, in a child abduction case, the court should consider the wishes of the child, in particular when the child (aged 15 years) was mature enough to reach a considered decision relating to his own welfare.
The facts in this case were as follows:
A married couple had two boys, who were still minors, when they divorced on September 5, 2007. The boys were born in the United Kingdom and were habitually resident in England. The divorce decree made no provision to the care and custody of the boys, who remained living with their mother, while the father had visitation rights.
In the past five years, the father moved residence to Malta.
In January 2010, the mother agreed to send the boys to Malta to spend a few days with their father, who had recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness.
The father failed, however, to return the boys and eventually informed the mother that the children would remain living with him.
Later the younger boy returned to the UK according to his wishes, but the older boy, aged 15 years and a half, chose to stay in Malta.
The older boy strongly objected to returning to England. He stated that he was better cared for in Malta.
In the UK, he did not live with mother. He shared an apartment with his gay half-brother and partner.
In these proceedings, the Director for Social Standards, acting on behalf of the mother, filed legal action in Malta in terms of the Child Abduction and Custody Act (Chapter 410 of the Laws of Malta). This Act ratified two Conventions relative to the civil aspects of international child abduction and to the recognition and enforcement of custody decisions and also in terms of the European Union Regulation No. 2201/2003 of November 27, 2003.
The mother claimed that the minors were illegally retained in Malta by their father.
The Malta Central Authority was requested by the United Kingdom Central Authority, in terms of Article 7 of the Convention on International Child Abduction, to discover the whereabouts of the minors and to obtain their immediate return.
The Malta Authority was authorised to act in the mother’s name, in terms of article 2 (1) of the UK’s Child Abduction Act 1989.
Both parents had parental responsibility over the children.
In this case, the mother claimed that the father was illegally retaining his minor children in Malta; that he changed their habitual residence without her consent and consequently violated her rights of parental responsibility.
She said the father acted in an illegal manner by completely isolating her from the minors.
The Malta Authority requested the Maltese courts to order the return of the two boys to the UK. In the interim period, the court was asked to give those directives in the interest of the said minors, including a notice to the competent authorities, in order to safeguard the children from being illegally removed from Malta to any other State, which removal would make the return of the minors to their habitual residence much more difficult and in express violation of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and of the European Union Regulation.
In reply, the father denied abducting his boys. Their younger son in the meantime had returned to the United Kingdom, while their older son did not want to return.
The father submitted that custody was vested in both parents jointly. It was stated that every parent had the same rights and obligations towards the minors.
In the absence of any court declaration where the minors had to reside, he disputed abducting his children.
The father maintained that there was no breach of the UK Child Abduction Act 1989. He said he was prepared to take care of their elder son; and keep him in Malta. Allegedly, the minor’s habitual residence was Malta, according to Regulation 2201/2003.
As the boy was 15 years old, the father told the court that he should be given the opportunity to voice his wishes.
The father argued that the court should dismiss the requests of the Director of Social Welfare, as it was not in the best interest of his son to return to the UK.
On September 10, 2010, the Civil Court (Family Section) refused the request to send the 15-year-old boy back to the UK.
The Court noted that the boy strongly objected to returning to the UK and that he was happy in Malta. He said that he enjoyed the way of life in Malta. He made many friends and had a part-time job.
The court said the boy was mature enough to take decisions and appreciate the consequences of his decision. Although, as he was under 16 years, the Child Abduction and Custody Act (Chapter 410) was applicable, the court was not bound to order the return of the child where there was a grave risk that his return would expose the him to physical or psychological harm, or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.
The same convention also admitted another exception to the rule of the immediate return of the child, where the child objected to being returned and had attained an age and degree of maturity at which it was appropriate to take account of his views.
It was noted that the scheme of The Hague Convention was that, in normal circumstances, it was considered to be in the best interests of children generally that they should be promptly returned to the country whence they were wrongfully removed, and that it was only in exceptional cases that the court should have a discretion to refuse to order an immediate return.
In Zaffino vs Zaffino (Abduction: Children’s Views – 2005) Thorpe LJ stated that “the court must balance the nature and strength of the child’s objections against both the Convention considerations [obviously including comity and respect for the judicial processes in the requesting state] and also general welfare considerations”.
The court observed that the child was mature enough to reach a considered decision relating to his own welfare; and that the court was bound to give due weight to his views and wishes
To hold otherwise would stultify the provision requiring the court to take, where appropriate, account of the child’s views.
For these reasons the Civil Court decided that, in the best interests of the child, it should decline the mother’s request.
The Director of Social Welfare standards entered an appeal, calling for the revocation of the decision of the Civil Court.
On December 3, 2010, the Court of Appeal gave judgment by dismissing the appeal and by confirming the decision of the first court. The following reasons were given for the court’s decision:
The Director put forward the argument that the mere desire to remain in Malta was not sufficient to hinder the application of the Child Abduction and Custody Act.
Under ordinary circumstances the court would not have hesitated to return the child to England, where it not for Article 13 of the Convention which permitted a refusal to make a return order if the judicial authority felt that the child objected to being returned and had attained an age and degree of maturity of which it was appropriate to take account of his views. The child in question was 15 years and six months old, and both the first court and the Court of Appeal were of the opinion that the child had sufficient maturity to have his views taken into account.
Given the age of the child, the court felt it was incumbent upon it to hear his views. The court said there was no additional requirement to establish that there was a grave risk that a return order would expose the child to psychological harm. Nor was it required to consider whether the child objected to returning in any circumstances; it was enough for the child to indicate that, in the present circumstances, he objected to returning to his mother.
The court had the discretion to order the return of the minor but felt that it should consider the child’s wishes. It did not think that his views had been “shaped” or “coloured” by parental pressure.
The child wished to remain in Malta with his father who showed more interest in his welfare than his family in England.
In addition, his mother had a history of alcohol abuse and his fears in this regard justified the court not to order his return to the UK.
Dr Grech Orr is a partner at Ganado & Associates.
RAISING HEROES - DVD Movie